50nl river facing a 2xpot overbetshove

09.12.2008, 08:18 0

This was like the 3rd hand of the match, so no reads except he seems aggro (3bet the first hand). He's probably a reg although I never saw him before.

I was gonna check/snapcall a standardly sized riverbet, but he kind of caught me by surprise with his shove. I don't think he would do that with less than AJ, and at the same time I don't see a lot of bluffs in his range except 76.

Would you play the turn differently ? if so, why ?
would you call the river ?

Full Tilt Poker, $0.25/$0.50 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 2 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

SB: $94.50
Hero (BB): $50

Pre-Flop: 8♥ T♠ dealt to Hero (BB)
SB raises to $1.50, Hero calls $1

Flop: ($3) 8♣ A♠ 5♥ (2 Players)
Hero checks, SB bets $2.50, Hero calls $2.50

Turn: ($8) T♣ (2 Players)
Hero checks, SB bets $7, Hero calls $7

River: ($22) J♦ (2 Players)
Hero checks, SB bets $83.50 and is All-In, Hero folds

Results: $22 Pot ($0.50 Rake)
SB mucked and WON $21.50 (+$10.50 NET)

6 replies

Sebra

Joined: 01.08.2006

Posts: 827

09.12.2008, 12:30 0

Calling here should be really really bad, you have to be correct such a high percentage of the time and usually people overbet with the nuts far more often than with a bluff.

_Anonymous_

09.12.2008, 15:58 0

i dont mind check raising this turn especialy in the start because regs tend to be suspicious and dont like being outplayed and a lot of times they think you have some kind of draw and stack off with a pair of aces

i snap fold river with no reads in the begining of the match . you get owned almost everytime . he expects that board to hit you hard and he doesnt expect to you to fold too much here when he shoves but he still shoves

btw i dont like calling t8 pre without any reads