Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] Nl100 SH - check-raise a habitual cbettor in 3-way pot

4 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
38 Views

SB ($37.55) 48/35/3/50
Hero ($101)
UTG ($99)
UTG+1 ($12.80)
CO ($118) 19(vpip)/14(pfr)/5.5(af)/23(wtsd) on 1.7k hands, cbet: 73, fold cbet to raise: 70 (10)
BTN ($188)

Dealt to Hero 4♣3♣

fold, fold, CO raises to $3, fold, SB calls $2.50, Hero calls $2,

FLOP ($9) 9♠3♥8♠

check, check, CO bets $6, SB folds, Hero raises to $17, CO raises to $40, Hero folds,

CO wins $40.90

I tried to bluff a habitual cbettor here. I recently decided to attack these leaks, unfortunately my first attemp was not succesful.
I think it's a good spot, i can represent sets, two pair and strong draws here. I guess he hit something here and i was just unlucky. What do you think?
Was my raise size ok? I thought it's enough against this guy, if he had nothing he would fold no matter the raise size.

It's a 3way pot, so do i have to give much more credit to a cbet here? Any statistics on heads-up and 3way cbet differences in general? I even don't know what percentage i cbet in heads-up and in 3way...
Can i get it from HM somehow?

Thanks,
kesgab


3 replies

Not the best spot (floptexture) to bluffraise imo.

CO (ori raiser) usually has a hand (good draw or Overpair) here when he c-bets IP vs 2 players on a very drawwy board. Personally I like checking ATo/AJo type of hands here as original raiser IP.

Also you raise amount is a bit low, so he has to call only 11 to win 42 -> 1/4 odds he'll never ever fold overpair or A9 here.

Not the best board to bluff. Rather like 1 high card and 2 small cards with a flushdraw to bluffraise: Q♠ 6♥ 4♠ type of boards.


TribunCaesar
Joined: 29.04.2007

If he bets on such a board vs 2 opponents and one of them is a half stack fish he always has a hand! Put yourself in his position and think about hands you would cbet with.

Best regards,
TribunCaesar


Thank you Diedobal and TribunCaesar for the replies, they were very useful to me. The fish, the drawy board and the 2 opponents really makes villain's bet a probable valuebet. It looks so obvious now.... i guess i learnt something here :)