Hi. Just had an interesting hand in which on the river, villain shoved all in. I had a full house so called and won. But looking back over the hand, I was thinking, if I was the villain, how would I have played his hand?
Pokerstars NL2 zoom 9 handed.
Hero UTG ($1.93)
UTG+1 ($4.78)
Villain HJ ($1.37)
Hero raises 3BB (0.6)with Ah6h
UTG+1 calls
Fold
Fold
Villain re-raises to 5 BB (0.10)
Folds round to Hero. Hero calls 0.4. UTG+1 calls 0.4
Flop ($0.33) As 6s 8d
Hero checks, UTG+1 checks, Villian checks.
Turn ($0.33) Ad
Hero bets 0.16, UTG+1 folds, Villain calls
River ($0.65) 9s
Hero bets 0.41, Villain bets $1.11 and is all in. Hero calls.
Showdown ($2.87)
Hero shows A6 for a Full house (AAA66)
Villain shows AKs for 3 of a Kind (Aces) with King kicker.
If villain had reraised pre flop higher and not given me such good odds to call, I would have folded. If he CBet the flop, I would have put him on a strong hand and would have checked the turn.
Do you think Villain played badly? How would you have played?