Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

KK op

6 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
913 Views
jardablazek123
Joined: 29.12.2010

Party Poker $10.00 No Limit Hold'em - 5 players
BB: $12.46 - VPIP: 23, PFR: 21, 3B: 8, AF: 2.0, Hands: 149
UTG: $11.92 - VPIP: 41, PFR: 9, 3B: 6, AF: 3.1, Hands: 109
CO: $10.00 - VPIP: 29, PFR: 22, 3B: 12, AF: 1.4, Hands: 51
BTN: $10.41 - VPIP: 43, PFR: 0, 3B: 0, AF: 0.7, Hands: 44
Hero (SB): $10.63 -

Pre Flop: ($0.15) Hero is SB with K :club: K :heart:
UTG calls $0.10, 1 fold, BTN calls $0.10, Hero raises to $0.52, 2 folds, BTN calls $0.42

Flop: ($1.24) J :spade: 9 :club: 3 :club: (2 players)
Hero bets $0.73, BTN raises to $1.60, Hero calls $0.87

Turn: ($4.44) Q :spade: (2 players)
Hero checks, BTN bets $2.20, Hero calls $2.20

River: ($8.84) 2 :club: (2 players)
Hero checks, BTN checks


Reply
Quote
5 replies
Alleen86
Joined: 27.05.2010

I would make it bigger preflop, at least 6bb's. Then would make it like like 80-90% on the flop vs fish and if he raises, I think folding is the best with no further info, but if we would have an info that he is capable of raising TP for value or FD as a bluff, then we could 3bet and try to get it in. I don't like to call on such a board.


Reply
Quote
YohanN7
Joined: 15.06.2009

Considering the pot odds you get on flop and turn, and the fishy stats of villain, I can't criticize your play. Some would argue that the passiveness of this fish (stats) would argue for a fold. That too is a valid point.


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

I agree with the bigger sizes and fold vs a raise.


Reply
Quote
krasops
Joined: 02.02.2014

0.60$ Atleast pre
0.90$ Atleast flop
not a huge difference though ,
nh next ;)


Reply
Quote
la55i
Joined: 27.01.2013

I agree with bigger pet sizes. Villain looks so passive that I would fold to his raise.


Reply
Quote