zoom KQs 3b SB/UTG

And the reasons for 3b pre, for calling the turn raise are?....

Because of your sizing, you got 1 street of value from this ... which is okish, but very probably u can get 2 streets.

I dislike your sizings because small bets can make people raise as a bluff and you are getting into leveling games.
and he did in fact raise turn, and if he shoves river i have to snap call there because of the inducing sizings.

Would have called pre, would have fold turn.
Would have bet flop at least 1/2 psb and turn 30-40% psb.
As played, river is xf

Without info on villain I prefer calling pre flop. Turn is a fold.
As played give up on the river.

I would call preflop. Turn is definitely a fold.

lots of people say it is a standard call, yet for me it is a standard 3b
This means you guys insist too much on preflop when it can actually go either way. Either option is good, i prefer 3b and being the aggressor

Truth is neither option is very profitableX( (I am not folding but I like very much to win really big pots.)

I would play mixed strategy with KQs in these positions. This is easily dominated hand and could lead to big losses. Still I'm not folding with this. I prefer calling because 1. it is suited 2. we have no info if villain opens tight or loose and how he reacts to 3bets.

It's standart 3b/F 4 me:) Postflop I attemted for 2x thin value with 1/3 sizings vs UTG vs TT, JJ mostly, on the turn I cannot fold vs this weird x/minR, but on the river I was on X/F mode

[converted_hand]
River: ($19.81) 8♦ (2 players)
Hero checks, UTG checks

[/hand_history][/converted_hand]

interesting that none of the "big speakers" comented on the hand after OP posted results

boys, learn from MR bonecore, he is a wise guy!

I said earlier that I would fold OTT and as played I would give up OTR.
We are playing microstakes against unknown. It is true that hero's bet size might induce villain to raise as a bluff but still calling his raise would require some info on villain. Against unknown it is better to fold in this kind of spots, I think. The fact that villain in this case had a bluff OTT doesn't change my opinion.

So when everything was already said, there is nothing left to comment even when hero posts result. Changing my opinion after that would be result oriented thinking.