zoom AQd SB/BTN

You don't close the action pre flop, BB can squeeze. I still prefer 3betting this hand even if villain is aggro maniac. In reality we can't base our decisions only on 30 hands. How many times villain did 4bet in those 30 hands?
If villain 4bets actively, shouldn't we just 5bet shove this hand? We probably crush his range.

It depends on the BB. If he is active , we can 3b, if he is passive, we can call preflop.
As played, river is a xf.

Unless you have a solid read on villain, we cannot stab river on this board particularly. Xf IMO

No need to have a read on villain in order to bluff on a scary board. Why would there be? If the hand was posted from the other point of view (we were on button) and we had, say, Kx, then everyone and his mother would say "fold, there is a 4-straight on the board". Everyone, me too.

At 1st I tough for an pot size on the river, but when I review the hand after mine thoughts changed - I expected him to barrel this turn quite often, he picked so SDV or improve to better drew. On the river he has more Tx than me for shure and many 2 pears . hm It's a X/F.

Originally posted by vengeance77
At 1st I tough for an pot size on the river, but when I review the hand after mine thoughts changed - I expected him to barrel this turn quite often, he picked so SDV or improve to better drew. On the river he has more Tx than me for shure and many 2 pears . hm It's a X/F.

Pot sized bet would be horrible (why lose more when you are losing). Half pot bet gets the job done most often when possible at all, and allows for villain to have the line you are suggesting most of the time and still be profitable. You'd need 33% folds. On this board you get that.