Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

.02/04 FL 6Max - AKo

4 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
3,413 Views
BIKEBOY79
Joined: 20.02.2013

HOLE CARDS
Dealt to HERO [Ks Ah]
vistomsk: raises $0.02 to $0.04
HERO: raises $0.02 to $0.06
xxStarskyxx leaves the table
MykytenkoM: folds
K.CIH: folds
robipokeric: folds
vistomsk: calls $0.02
FLOP [Ad Kc 7d]
vistomsk: checks
HERO: bets $0.02
vistomsk: raises $0.02 to $0.04
HERO: raises $0.02 to $0.06
vistomsk: calls $0.02

The EP bet preflop and the flop raise/call makes me think he has A9s+, ATo+

TURN [Ad Kc 7d] [5h]
vistomsk: checks
HERO: bets $0.04
vistomsk: raises $0.04 to $0.08
HERO: raises $0.04 to $0.12
vistomsk: raises $0.04 to $0.16
Betting is capped
HERO: calls $0.04

Now I think maybe A7 or A5 but likely splitting with another AK. 77 possible, but more Ax out there than 77

RIVER [Ad Kc 7d 5h] [2h]
vistomsk: checks
HERO: bets $0.04
vistomsk: calls $0.04
SHOW DOWN
HERO: shows [Ks Ah] (two pair, Aces and Kings)
vistomsk: shows [7s 7h] (three of a kind, Sevens)

Should I have gotten away from this? Not capped?


Reply
Quote
3 replies
Moderator
SDK1987
Joined: 12.11.2008

The only logic hand you don’t beat is 77. So I don’t think I would play it differently on every street as FLHE fish. Further it’s smart to us a hand converter like weaktight, because than is your hand easier to read for us.

Cheers,
SDK1987


Reply
Quote
YohanN7
Joined: 15.06.2009

You could get away 2 BB cheaper (I'd not 3-bet turn), but it is not a big deal.

EDIT: The rationale for slowing down in this and similar spots, even if you believe you are ahead, is that aggression wins you one bet when ahead and costs you two bets when behind.

As far as hand reading goes, sure, you can use Bayes' theorem on conditional probabilities (more Ax than 77), but there is other evidence to consider. His line is very typical for a set. He can hold in all 5 combos that beat or crush you. He can have only 4 combos of A7s/A5s. (Is he really playing A7o UTG?). Then, would he 3-bet all of them on the flop? Maybe the two A7s.

Thus you beat 2 combos in his assumed value range (I am talking about turn here), and you lose to 5 combos (AA/KK/77). Thus already Bayes' theorem tells you to slow down. Now he check-raises you on the turn on a blank...

The turn 3-bet is not good. The reason that it is no big deal is that players at the very lowest stakes will be irrational, and you might have them beat on occasion.


Reply
Quote
DAIMA2
Joined: 12.04.2011

I am sure that if you did not three bet turn the bet at river would be
Vist bets, you with 2 top pairs raises, vist 3,bets you call
I think that you cant not only call river with these cards
If the river card was diamond or 7 you would call and loose less
But with 2the last card i think that it was the same
Or turn -4 river -1 or turn -2 river -3 big bets
Because i had played with vist i would have played as you


Reply
Quote