Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

NL16 SH AQo, CO vs BB, TPTK

4 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
553 Views
Alleen86
Joined: 27.05.2010

Poker Stars, $0.08/$0.16 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 5 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

SB: $7.72 (48.3 bb)
BB: $20.29 (126.8 bb)
MP: $16.24 (101.5 bb)
Hero (CO): $16.53 (103.3 bb)
BTN: $16.43 (102.7 bb)

Preflop: Hero is CO with Q♠: A♦:
MP folds, Hero raises to $0.40, BTN folds, SB calls $0.32, BB folds

Flop: ($0.96) Q♥: 2♠: 7♠: (2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $0.64, SB calls $0.64

Turn: ($2.24) 6♦: (2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $1.44, SB raises to $3.04, Hero??

Preflop: Standard. SB is an aggro fish, playing 52/39 in 49 hands.

Flop: Cbetting for value.

Turn: Cbetting for value again, but the he raised. I would most likelly fold vs normal stacked reg, but should it be fold vs this guy? I supose calling would be bad, given the effective stacks. So, fold or shove?


Reply
Quote
3 replies
la55i
Joined: 27.01.2013

Against recreational shove might not be that bad. Folding is always the safer option though :)


Reply
Quote
piR
piR
Joined: 31.08.2008

Agree with la55i > 49hands is not a sample big enough though. so I would prefer a fold here imo.


Reply
Quote
Mozzek
Joined: 16.07.2016

Bet stronger OTF, as villain is a fish. I was thinking about what you guys said. That callin OTT is bad. But why is it bad? Villain is a fish and he would call our shove almost for sure. We are afraid of flush draw and some staight draws, isn´t it better to just call and see the river and then decided based on what villain does? And yes, 49 hands is not much, but is enough to rely on VPIP imo.


Reply
Quote