Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

KQJ9ss

4 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
472 Views
Tim64
Joined: 03.11.2008

Party, $0.10/$0.25 Pot Limit Omaha Cash, 6 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

SB: $16.96 (67.8 bb)
BB: $33.13 (132.5 bb)
UTG: $15.74 (63 bb)
MP: $25 (100 bb)
CO: $20.98 (83.9 bb)
Hero (BTN): $92.78 (371.1 bb)

Preflop: Hero is BTN with K♠: Q♠: J♠: 9♦:
UTG folds, MP raises to $0.85, CO calls $0.85, Hero calls $0.85, 2 folds

Flop: ($2.90) T♣: 9♠: 4♣: (3 players)
MP checks, CO checks, Hero bets $2.30, MP raises to $9.66, CO folds, Hero calls $7.36

Turn: ($22.22) 3♠: (2 players)
MP bets $14.49 and is all-in, Hero calls $14.49

River: ($51.20) 6♣: (2 players, 1 is all-in)

Results:

Spoiler

$51.20 pot ($2.56 rake)
Final Board: T♣: 9♠: 4♣: 3♠: 6♣:
MP showed J♥: 6♥: J♣: 8♣: and won $48.64 ($23.64 net)
Hero showed K♠: Q♠: J♠: 9♦: and lost (-$25 net)

Any reason not to bet our draw when checked to? Once we get x/r do we need to fold given effective stacks? I assume villain has a range mostly consisting of flushdraws, probably strong ones.


Reply
Quote
3 replies
Coach
Kyyberi
Joined: 09.07.2010

Why can't his range be mostly made up with sets and 2pairs?


Reply
Quote
nsavov
Joined: 24.09.2010

I think you played it fine.
If you make one player fold low fd or A9xx you are making alot of money, so I think betting is fine :f_thumbsup:


Reply
Quote
Tim64
Joined: 03.11.2008

Originally posted by Kyyberi
Why can't his range be mostly made up with sets and 2pairs?

Well it could, I guess. I just supposed that such hands would be more likely to bet now to protect their sets/2p if everyone were to check.


Reply
Quote