AQs 3b OOP multiway

I like the line, you can't get 3 streets by betting yourself and people tend to level themselves from time to time to float those small bets way too wide.

Considered X/Jamming turn?
If we're beat, we're beat. We're x/c most rivers anyway so no change there.
But when we're ahead, we're not MILES ahead(i.e. set on dry board would be). Just look at how many draws/out he can have and is basicly freerolling if you x/c instead of playing x/r.

I never even considered X/jam on the turn. and to be honest, if the river came anything but an A / Q, i would be inclined to fold to a ship.
I think X/jam on the turn would be too aggressive. There aren't that many draws out there, JQs MAYBE, 7d/9d/x perhaps,.. and if we get called i doubt we're ever ahead unless he is a fish.

I like your line and i would not x/jam OTT also. I do not see many draws out there either. Maybe Varune can defend his interesting suggestion though.

Every pair is still drawing to another 5 outs. If they have 7x/9xdd it's even 14 outs. TJ still has 8 outs and random diamond floats have 9 aswell.
He's not going to doublestab you /w air OTR so yea i'd argue x/f otr is ok when playing this line and not improving.
He's mostly just checking back 1pair hands etc because your range is faceup after the x/c, no point in bluffing someone off a strong Ax imo.

BUT as i said in the first line, most of that air he's betting on the turn, as a bluff, still has like 20% equity. He's in position, he knows your hand, so he can decide to bet river or not when he hits. By x/jamming you deny this option and don't have a guessing game on the river.

I mean all this said, about my range and whatnot, I don't even consider to be much of a leak to exploit. I don't expect the average NL10 player to take such an agro line of stabbing with a draw in a 3b pot; it represents a ton of strength to call and then bet.
In hindsight I'm even considering folding the turn, but our hand is under-repped and a little too strong to straight out fold. I think it's closer then it seems though.

Check shipping the turn is a high varience line, and for it to be profitable in the long run we need stats on our opponent to know he can have bluffs in his range here. I think without is a little too spewy.

X/folding turn would be horrible. That means your 3betting and hoping to flop 2p+ to play any further than the flop.
I'd rather see you betting turn smallish again to milk his draws. He'll most likely will raise his value, 'he want's to build a pot'. And most often won't really bluffraise you as your range is still rather uncapped by betting twice.

Folding on the river is not the case, you either call or raise (even though it's hard to expect a call from anything that isn't at least a trips)