Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

AKQ2ds as3bettor oop

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
488 Views
TheLearningM1ndset
Joined: 09.09.2017

villain is maniacish recreational plr ~45/30 so i think its similar as if i played against a range of CO open here, and yea, i would not 3bet this too often, but i thought i had a relevant postflop read on a villian i wanted to use. but here , lets ignore this

how do u play this F and why? lets say u were even vs BU opener, if u would not 3bet it ever against CO

i can see merits for betting ~1/2-3/5 and checking, what do u prefer and why? lets consider a good-regs postflop tendencies for this limit

Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

SB: $100 (100 bb)
Hero (BB): $131.80 (131.8 bb)
MP: $153.26 (153.3 bb)
CO: $227.96 (228 bb)
BTN: $334.18 (334.2 bb)

Preflop: Hero is BB with A♦: Q♥: K♦: 2♥:
MP raises to $3, 3 folds, Hero raises to $9.50, MP calls $6.50

Flop: ($19.50) 8♠: Q♦: T♥: (2 players)
??


Reply
Quote
2 replies
Moderator
SDK1987
Joined: 12.11.2008

I’m no PLO player, but I don’t think I would often 3bet out of position against a recreational player with a double suited hand that can play well post-flop.

On the flop, we have some backdoor flush and straight draws and top pair. I don’t think it’s too bad to make a thin Cbet on the flop and her-evaluate on further action.

Cheers,
SDK1987


Reply
Quote
Tim64
Joined: 03.11.2008

Any reads on MP postflop? Is he likely to bet if checked to? I don't think you can b/f this hand in a 3b pot for 100bb given all your backdoors (assuming you bet close to pot). For 130bb it's a bit closer. I'd more likely go for a x/c, especially if you think villain can bet wide.

Vs a good reg on this limit (which I don't yet play) I'd still be inclined to check since I'd guess it's slightly better for his range than ours (though close). I don't mind having this in a x/c or x/s range (again for 100bb) though i think it works better as a x/c.


Reply
Quote