BB is again Urubu,
both other guys winning regs, both on the tighter and more passive side.
again, i just dont get the F decision to x/c at all.. i mean, ok, protecting ranges, but what in particular does he have in mind? he loses so much value vs fds many of which wont bet, or even 2pair w no redr/ pairs+gutters/some blockers, etc, which all would call a reaonable bet, but not bet themselves.. what is he hoping for?
a bet wide OTT from pfr who most likely has a 100% check here so is not rly capped too much, but still.. not a board good for him, so why not stab at it wide, when board is best for BB by far.. i d actually bet 2/3-3/4 pretty wide here. and havent rly considered that i should defend x/c THAT much. i mean SB is defending a lot there still too, so i can deffo overfold vs a bet from BU, even if SB happens to fold..
Poker Stars, $1/$2 Pot Limit Omaha Cash, 6 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.
SB: $285.09 (142.5 bb)
BB: $433.58 (216.8 bb)
UTG: $200 (100 bb)
MP: $383.24 (191.6 bb)
CO: $211.69 (105.8 bb)
BTN: $329.54 (164.8 bb)
Preflop:
3 folds, BTN raises to $5, SB raises to $17, BB calls $15, BTN calls $12
Flop: ($51) T♥: 7♥: 8♦: (3 players)
SB checks, BB checks, BTN bets $32, SB folds, BB calls $32
Turn: ($115) 2♣: (2 players)
BB checks, BTN bets $70, BB raises to $322.25, BTN calls $210.54
River: ($676.08) A♥: (2 players)
Results:
Spoiler
$676.08 pot ($2.75 rake)
Final Board: T♥: 7♥: 8♦: 2♣: A♥:
BB showed 9♦: T♠: J♣: T♦: and won $673.33 ($343.79 net)
BTN showed A♦: K♠: 8♥: 8♠: and lost (-$329.54 net)
also: when he already lured the bet from BU, why not x/r then? i mean he has a redraw w the nuts and loses so much vs made hands on half of the deck right? i presume, he wants to have a resonable x/c range to be able to after x/x bet a lot OTR.. but still.. does this rly matter when the board is THIS dynamic?
