Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

Zoom, KK on HJ, easy spot or tough spot?

8 Posts
5 Users
3 Reactions
401 Views
Dr1fter808
Joined: 11.10.2017

Thoughts?

PokerStars - $0.25 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

BTN: 64.92 BB (VPIP: 12.50, PFR: 6.25, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 16)
SB: 76.6 BB (VPIP: 32.02, PFR: 20.79, 3Bet Preflop: 1.52, Hands: 179)
BB: 85.36 BB (VPIP: 50.00, PFR: 30.00, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 12)
UTG: 123.44 BB (VPIP: 23.68, PFR: 10.53, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 39)
Hero (MP): 103.88 BB
CO: 84.56 BB (VPIP: 42.86, PFR: 28.57, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 7)

SB posts SB 0.4 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.4 BB) Hero has K♠ K♣

fold, Hero raises to 3 BB, CO calls 3 BB, fold, fold, fold

Flop: (7.4 BB, 2 players) 6♣ 4♦ 4♣
Hero bets 3.88 BB, CO raises to 13 BB, Hero calls 9.12 BB

Turn: (33.4 BB, 2 players) 9♦
Hero checks, CO bets 16 BB, Hero calls 16 BB

River: (65.4 BB, 2 players) Q♠
Hero checks, CO bets 52.56 BB and is all-in


Reply
Quote
7 replies
mistralx
Joined: 13.08.2014

Pretty good run out to calldown this hand.
Ofc fish have some 4x in his range, but still he has many worse.
River sizing is unpleasant, but I think he has too many bluffs (FD, 6x, Qx which had FD).


Reply
Quote
greatpk
Joined: 04.05.2016

Well you have to think, which hands you beat and which hands beats you. Since he showed agression all 3 streets, he has to have connected with the board. I dont think he would play 6x hand that agressive, also Qx hands doesnt make sense to bet the turn unless he has something like AQs to QJs with flush draw. He obviously doesnt have AA QQ, KK, JJ, 10s, otherwise he would 3bet pre flop. At this point your only ahead to missed flush draws or 6x hands that trys to bluff you off on river, but thats very unlikely since he showed agression all 3 streets long. Your behind any 4x hand, 66s, 99s. I think its pretty clear that he beats us at the river, so i would just lay down my KK this time. Hes line looks too strong to be a bluff. Most likely he has 4x hand or 66s, and the river bet is for value.


Reply
Quote
Fanko
Joined: 24.08.2010

I would mostly just check/raise AI on the turn and be done with it. When we choose to play the turn passively, then we are pretty much obliged to call any river that doesn't complete his draws (maybe fold on non-club aces as well).


Reply
Quote
greatpk
Joined: 04.05.2016

I agree on check/raising the turn, cause then most of the hands that you beat, will fold and you wont have to make a tough decission on river, but i totally disagree with check/calling the river. Bassicly, what hands that we do beat, calls our check/raise? Only flush draws calls us. If they call us on the turn, we have to either check/fold OTR or bet our self. So if he calls the turn, we can pretty much give up on the river, and call only a small river bet, cause its pretty clear we are beaten at that point. There are allmost no hands we beat and few hands that beats us.


Reply
Quote
Fanko
Joined: 24.08.2010

If he calls the turn, there are no chips left to make decisions about on the river. The whole point of the passive approach in this hand is to get maximum value of his bluffs and semi-bluffs OTT, then shipping it for value and protection.


Reply
Quote
greatpk
Joined: 04.05.2016

Originally posted by Fanko
If he calls the turn, there are no chips left to make decisions about on the river. The whole point of the passive approach in this hand is to get maximum value of his bluffs and semi-bluffs OTT, then shipping it for value and protection.

Oh sorry i missread your post. Yea Check/shoving OTT is probobly the best play there.


Reply
Quote
Tomaloc
Joined: 17.01.2011

i would be very inclined to just 3bet flop to set a turn ship against a fishy player. i do actually expect to have over 50% against his continuing range, he might well overplay any 6x-JJ hands and FD.
as played, of course it's never fun to face aggression but i do agree that this is a good runout to station


Reply
Quote