Hey Guys,
Like some opinions on this hand, felt good while playing but in reflection it might have been a bad one.
(sorry about the crappy formatting, coudn't copy/paste it directly so I had to add the images by hand, anybody know a better way maybe?)
Party Poker ($0.05/$0.10 limit). Hand converted by Check Raised hand converter
Preflop (10 players): Hero is MP1 with
![]()
2 folds. HERO calls. MP2 2 bets. 2 folds. CO calls. BTN calls. 2 folds. HERO calls.
Flop (9.4 small bets ($0.47) in pot, 4 players):
![]()
HERO checks. MP2 bets. CO folds. BTN folds. HERO calls.
Turn (5.7 bets ($0.57) in pot, 2 players):
HERO bets. MP2 2 bets. HERO calls.
River (9.7 bets ($0.97) in pot, 2 players):
![]()
HERO checks. MP2 checks.
Summary:
HERO has a pair of Sevens [
] and won $0.97 (9.7bb)
MP2 has High card. [
]
Alright, he raises preflop, meaning either a pocketpair or expected overcards. Didn't have much of a read on his betting behaviour except that he raised a lot when actually in the pot.
The flop bet was really quick so I figured he didn't hit it and tried to scare players away.
Turn raise was just as quick, seemed like a scare tactic again.
I checked the river in case of the flush draw (would've called him for the pot odds)
I pegged him for overcards that missed the flop, called his turn raise with the same reasoning (and the fact that if he had a likely ace it would now be tainted).
Somewhere in the reasoning I completely lost the notion that he could've flopped a set on the flop.
Weak play or good read?