I am pretty sure I already know what you are going to say: it's check-fold on turn and bad luck on the river, right?
I have to say, usually I would fold pocket nine's as a 2nd pair vs double barreling MP. In this hand I didn't because, hm ya I was looking on the board and told myself, that he has some open ended straight draws and some flushdraws in his range and I could make him fold top pair on a decent river. When I saw my set hitting, and him betting potsize after already 2 streets of value, I really was thinking he must have QQ, as he indeed had - but then again, if he is kind of into the game he also could bluffbet big his busted draws and also pocket 5 and 8's. The latter would as well call a river shove.. so I guess, I played it ok. What do you think?
EDIT: ok I see now that the 9 made some of his draws hit, like 67. So the river shove maybe wasn't best bet, hm? I am not sure how to calculate that. 6 combos of weaker value hands and a lot more of hands that beat me that happily call my shove.
PokerStars Zoom No-Limit Hold'em, $0.02 BB (6 handed) - Converted at http://www.handhistoryconverter.com/
Button ($2.01)
SB ($2.67)
BB ($3.26)
UTG ($1.54)
MP ($2.98)
Hero (CO) ($4.89)
Preflop: Hero is CO with 9♦, 9♣
1 fold, MP raises to $0.06, Hero calls $0.06, 3 folds
Flop: ($0.15) 8♦, 5♣, Q♠ (2 players)
MP bets $0.10, Hero calls $0.10
Turn: ($0.35) 2♠ (2 players)
MP bets $0.20, Hero calls $0.20
River: ($0.75) 9♥ (2 players)
MP bets $0.72, Hero raises to $4.53 (All-In), MP calls $1.90 (All-In)
Total pot: $5.99 | Rake: $0.21
Results:
Spoiler
MP had Q♦, Q♣ (three of a kind, Queens).
Hero had 9♦, 9♣ (three of a kind, nines).
Outcome: MP won $5.78
EDIT: so i stopped playing for today. 700 hands, +92BB/100 Hands - and if i wouldve played this exact hand as a river call, it wouldve been 105 bb/100 Hands
woopie - big big heater session plus some fine selecting of lines made this happen. I felt, that I easily couldve bluffed more, but since I do not like bluffing with almost complete air, I gave up some marginal spots.