Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

light c-bet; IP; 3-handed

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
348 Views
ben002
Joined: 03.03.2018

Most likely a bad idea :f_ugly:

$0.05 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players

MP: $7.18
Hero (CO): $5.69
BTN: $6.91
SB: $7.58 (VPIP: 47.37, PFR: 31.58, 3Bet Preflop: 16.22, Hands: 77)
BB: $11.32 (VPIP: 11.11, PFR: 9.88, 3Bet Preflop: 5.00, Hands: 82)
UTG: $2.97

SB posts SB $0.02, BB posts BB $0.05

Pre Flop: (pot: $0.07) Hero has K♣ J♥

fold, fold, Hero raises to $0.15, fold, SB calls $0.13, BB calls $0.10

Flop: ($0.45, 3 players) 8♣ Q♠ 3♥
SB checks, BB checks, Hero bets $0.22, fold, BB calls $0.22

Turn: ($0.89, 2 players) 4♠
BB checks, Hero checks

River: ($0.89, 2 players) 2♣
BB checks, Hero checks

Thoughts:
I think this would have been a good c-bet in a HU situation. I block some combos of KQ and QJ, have one overcard and a backdoor-gutshot. The board is rather dry. But now it's multiway and one guy seems to be quite spewy. So I should expect very low fold-equity which most likely makes the check IP more profitably then the c-bet.

Questions:
1. Do you agree, that c-betting was bad in this situation?
2. Do you think this would have been a good c-bet IP/OOP heads-up against unknown?
3. Do you think it would have been a viable c-bet in the same situation if both players were completely unknown?


Reply
Quote
2 replies
Moderator
SDK1987
Joined: 12.11.2008

1. I would check behind as well against 2 players and against 1 player a Cbet would be better for sure.
2. Depends on the villain if I would Cbet against 1 player, but I would do it most of the time.
3. Against 2 unknowns I wouldn’t Cbet ether in a spot like this.

Cheers,
SDK1987


Reply
Quote
DecMate
Joined: 25.01.2009

If you had the backdoor suit draw it'd be fine but with KJo you have nothing going on.
If it was HU you could c-bet, barrel a 10/A/K.


Reply
Quote