Most likely a bad idea ![]()
$0.05 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
MP: $7.18
Hero (CO): $5.69
BTN: $6.91
SB: $7.58 (VPIP: 47.37, PFR: 31.58, 3Bet Preflop: 16.22, Hands: 77)
BB: $11.32 (VPIP: 11.11, PFR: 9.88, 3Bet Preflop: 5.00, Hands: 82)
UTG: $2.97
SB posts SB $0.02, BB posts BB $0.05
Pre Flop: (pot: $0.07) Hero has K♣ J♥
fold, fold, Hero raises to $0.15, fold, SB calls $0.13, BB calls $0.10
Flop: ($0.45, 3 players) 8♣ Q♠ 3♥
SB checks, BB checks, Hero bets $0.22, fold, BB calls $0.22
Turn: ($0.89, 2 players) 4♠
BB checks, Hero checks
River: ($0.89, 2 players) 2♣
BB checks, Hero checks
Thoughts:
I think this would have been a good c-bet in a HU situation. I block some combos of KQ and QJ, have one overcard and a backdoor-gutshot. The board is rather dry. But now it's multiway and one guy seems to be quite spewy. So I should expect very low fold-equity which most likely makes the check IP more profitably then the c-bet.
Questions:
1. Do you agree, that c-betting was bad in this situation?
2. Do you think this would have been a good c-bet IP/OOP heads-up against unknown?
3. Do you think it would have been a viable c-bet in the same situation if both players were completely unknown?