PokerStars, $0.98 + $0.12 - Hold'em No Limit - 20/40 (5 ante) - 9 players
UTG: 4,882 (122 bb)
UTG+1: 4,983 (125 bb)
MP: 4,961 (124 bb)
MP+1: 5,203 (130 bb)
LP: 5,509 (138 bb)
CO: 9,354 (234 bb)
BU: 5,299 (132 bb)
SB (Hero): 4,726 (118 bb)
BB: 4,891 (122 bb)
Pre-Flop: (105) Hero is SB with T♣ T♥
UTG calls 40, 1 fold, MP calls 40, MP+1 calls 40, LP calls 40, CO calls 40, 1 fold, Hero raises to 365, BB calls 325, UTG calls 325, MP calls 325, 2 players fold, CO calls 325
Flop: (1,950) 3♠ 6♣ 6♥ (5 players)
Hero bets 683, BB raises to 1,366, UTG folds, MP calls 1,366, CO folds, Hero raises to 4,356 (all-in), BB folds, MP calls 2,990
Spoiler
Turn: (12,028) 4♣ (2 players, 1 all-in)
River: (12,028) K♠ (2 players, 1 all-in)
Total pot: 12,028
Showdown:
SB (Hero) shows T♣ T♥ (two pair, Tens and Sixes)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 68%, Flop: 9%, Turn: 5%, River: 0%)
MP shows A♦ 6♦ (three of a kind, Sixes)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 32%, Flop: 91%, Turn: 95%, River: 100%)
MP wins 12,028
Hi,
Opponents largely unknown, but the amount of limping must be a clue
Kind of an interesting spot on the flop - it should be full of bricks for pretty much everyone, but again, with this much limping, who knows what their ranges are. Decided to go with it because didn't expect anyone to have a large pair, and I could get value from smaller pairs (and perhaps even A-highs) without the risk of a scare card landing on a later street. Playing the hand the normal way likely would've ended up with me being all-in by the river anyway
Is this reasonable? Or should I be afraid of :6x:, or perhaps 33?
Thanks!