Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

Poker Etiquette

4 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
341 Views
Ac3onth3riv3r
Joined: 17.02.2017

Who is right in your opinion? Phil Hellmuth or Bellande?

Edit: I've thought about that. For one thing Phil is right. When the agressor got caught, he muck and the other player shows the winning hand to claim the pot. I've seen this on every High stakes poker videos on youtube. But Phil Hellmuth talking about poker etiquette...

Also I've red on the internet that for example: the agressor bets on the river, gets called and show the better hand the other player may muck right? But if the agressor asks him to show his hand he is obliged to do that? Is this true? Sorry about my bad english


Reply
Quote
3 replies
Lazza61
Joined: 23.03.2011

JRB in my opinion.

When he calls Hellmuth's river bet, he is paying to see Hellmuth's cards.

Hellmuth knows that if he's called then he is beat, however he doesn't want the whole table to see what cards he was holding. So he thinks that if he mucks then JRB still has to show the whole table what he has been playing.


Reply
Quote
ghaleon
Joined: 17.10.2007

Caller doesn't have to show his hand to take pot as his opponent has already thrown his hand into muck and given up right onto pot imo.


Reply
Quote