[Closed] Some of my hands

1) dont raise the river just call it you have only a pocketpair !
why you raise it in the first place ?

2) 3bet preflop bet flop

3) fold ore 3bet preflop depends on the opponent ,, if he has a high ore medium-high "pfr" than 3 bet if not fold

1) Where, on the flop, turn or river? River raising sure was a mistake.
Turn I thought if he had Ace Jack he would have 3-bet.
I also had a "Went to showdown Stat of him in the high 60s%" and a won at showdown of about 33%. Also a PostFlop-Folded-Hand stat of 5%!

2) Should I not have played AQs as in the SHC? And I did bet flop?

3) His PFR was 40% (only 10 hands). And he capped before with 22 and called a 3-bet with 96s.
I wasn't thinking about 3-betting (already calling sth. that wasn't in the SHC) should I do that in the future if I have a read on someone?

You're playing 0.05/0.10 tables but you already use pokertracker? Are you trialing or just really determined?
Weyouns suggestions are very well but I think a tad more aggressive and advanced than some beginners can handle, how long have you been playing?
Anyway, a more conservative look.

1) I don't think he had AJ, I'd put him om JT. Raising the river here was indeed a mistake, but can you see why?

2) To bet the flop against a preflop raiser (aka donkbetting) without holding anything is usually not a good idea, you can be pretty certain you're going to be raised. AQs is strong enough to 3bet preflop when you have so few opponents and might scare out the limper (especially against a CO or BU raise), but the SHC says raise/call for a reason and you played fine by it. You shoud've check/called the flop and then fold the turn without improvement (as per odds&outs)

3) PFR over 10 hands says nothing, to get decent stats you need at least 50+ hands. Still if you have a good personal read on him (aka, he overplays his hands/blufs like a maniac) then the preflop call isn't bad, infact you should indeed seriously consider 3betting to isolate him (since with a pocketpair you'll do better against few opponents and really good against an idiot).
However, why did you raise the turn after only calling his 3bet on the flop? That's a pretty sure way to be 3bet again. I'd just call down after his 3bet on the flop unless I made my full. Just because he's a maniac doesn't mean he can never hold something well and with such a big handraise you can never be certain what you're up against.

Originally posted by Anakha
You're playing 0.05/0.10 tables but you already use pokertracker? Are you trialing or just really determined?
Weyouns suggestions are very well but I think a tad more aggressive and advanced than some beginners can handle, how long have you been playing?
Anyway, a more conservative look.

A friend of mine had 2 and gave me one as a gift.
Actually I'm officially half way to 15/30 (having played 2500 hands), but I'll definitely wait till I'm at 75$ or 80$ for lvl 3.

It's amazing what one week of learning (and not even that many hands) can do. I'd now for sure raise preflop on 2) (I didn't understand the blinds stealing subject a week ago).

And I see how !dumb! my River-action at 1) was. And of course putting him to a JT (even though he had a KJs and just played very passively).

Originally posted by Da_Dave

A friend of mine had 2 and gave me one as a gift.
Actually I'm officially half way to 15/30 (having played 2500 hands), but I'll definitely wait till I'm at 75$ or 80$ for lvl 3.

That friend is a keeper :).

Originally posted by Da_Dave

It's amazing what one week of learning (and not even that many hands) can do. I'd now for sure raise preflop on 2) (I didn't understand the blinds stealing subject a week ago).

Personally I found blind stealing to be pretty much a none issue on the 0.05/0.10 tables, especially with a limper in front of him i'd say he just had a raising hand. From 0.10/0.20 and onward blind stealing (and general preflop raising) seemed a lot more prevelant to me (or at least on the tables I played) so you should be able to put that information to good use.