Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

SNG 6max 0.5€ 74s flushdraw oop|HU

5 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
696 Views
Mayb3n0T
Joined: 03.01.2017

PokerStars - 100/200 Ante 25 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 2 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

SB: 20.92 BB (VPIP: 52.38, PFR: 3.92, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 114)
Hero (BB): 24.08 BB

2 players post ante of 0.13 BB, SB posts SB 0.5 BB, Hero posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.75 BB) Hero has 7♦ 4♦

SB calls 0.5 BB, Hero checks

Flop: (2.25 BB, 2 players) T♦ A♦ 6♣
Hero checks, SB checks

Turn: (2.25 BB, 2 players) K♥
Hero checks, SB checks

River: (2.25 BB, 2 players) 8♦
Hero bets 1.12 BB, SB calls 1.12 BB

He is more passive with 82/24/0 on 20 hands, and was passive throught the sng. So this should be a situation where i consider to lead bet on limp pot, my hand has no showndown value with a good equity. So betting flop and turn should be a default line especially oop right?

Cumps ;)


Reply
Quote
4 replies
reggie123
Joined: 31.03.2009

I dont usually attack A high flop. You dont rep there much-some Tx, neaby 2 pair, most of the times just draws but when op offten limp/folds to cbet then make a small bet.


Reply
Quote
Moderator
SDK1987
Joined: 12.11.2008

Leading the flop seems fine as semi bluff against a range that isn't hitting this board to often, but the passive approach against a fish isn't to bad. It's not to likely he can fold if he hits this board.

Cheers,
SDK1987


Reply
Quote
ghaleon
Joined: 17.10.2007

A high flop is not really one to attack as reggie said. Especially versus player that can easily limp with good amount of Ax. But I would definitely semibluff bet turn to 2bb or so and as played make bigger bet on river also.


Reply
Quote
Mayb3n0T
Joined: 03.01.2017

And if he was more agressive, so more likely to cbet i should take the line of check-raising my hand or check-calling hoping to hit my flush due to the implied odds vs this kind of players? As he is more agressive is more likely that he raise almost every Ax so he could have a less stronger hand

Cumps ;)


Reply
Quote