Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[PLO4] two pair, nutflushdraw, inside nutstr8 draw: Was this right?

9 Posts
6 Users
1 Reactions
772 Views
Primrose6789
Joined: 01.07.2016

Hey guys,
What do you think of this hand? Was this right?

iPoker - €0.04 PL Hi (6 max) - Omaha Hi - 5 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

CO: 70.5 BB (VPIP: 66.67, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 3)
Hero (BTN): 95.25 BB
SB: 63 BB (VPIP: 42.86, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 22)
BB: 93.75 BB (VPIP: 91.84, PFR: 61.22, 3Bet Preflop: 11.11, Hands: 50)
UTG: 184 BB (VPIP: 28.85, PFR: 11.54, 3Bet Preflop: 4.00, Hands: 52)

SB posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has Q♣ K♠ A♠ 3♣

fold, fold, Hero raises to 3.5 BB, fold, BB calls 2.5 BB

Flop: (7.5 BB, 2 players) 8♠ Q♠ 3♥
BB checks, Hero bets 5.25 BB, BB calls 5.25 BB

Turn: (18 BB, 2 players) J♣
BB checks, Hero bets 12.5 BB, BB raises to 55.5 BB, Hero calls 43 BB

River: (129 BB, 2 players) 9♠
BB bets 29.5 BB, Hero calls 29.5 BB

Hero shows Q♣ K♠ A♠ 3♣ (Flush, Ace High)
(Pre 58%, Flop 87%, Turn 35%)
BB shows 9♣ A♦ T♦ 6♦ (Straight, Queen High)
(Pre 42%, Flop 13%, Turn 65%)
Hero wins 175.5 BB


Reply
Quote
8 replies
Moderator
SDK1987
Joined: 12.11.2008

I would most likely stack off the turn with 2 pair and strong draws against most likely a maniac and after his big check/raise you are committed anyway if you only call.

Cheers,
SDK1987


Reply
Quote
efkay
Joined: 25.03.2005

you have showdownvalue and block the k high flushdraws but have no straightblocker so i suggest you check behind the turn


Reply
Quote
Eselsdorfjung
Joined: 05.07.2014

Originally posted by efkay
you have showdownvalue and block the k high flushdraws but have no straightblocker so i suggest you check behind the turn

Is it funny, because I think we will have this situation in the future more often. I agree with you for higher stakes, but on micro stakes I prefer the more aggressive line as Prim took it. As a rule of thumb - if the turn changes the board in HU I would bet with a pretty high frequency because it increases the fold equity most of the time. As always on micros villain don´t fight back often enough.


Reply
Quote
Primrose6789
Joined: 01.07.2016

I actually wanted to get it in on flop, but Villain was passive. As he x/r turn it was clear for me that he hit some card which helped him. I counted my outs and saw that I have 9 outs for the nutflush plus every Q (2 outs) and probably a 3 (2 outs), plus every T (4 outs), so 14-17 outs. Too many outs to fold turn. As I put him on weak str8 or two pair, I counted 17 outs, so I counted the 3s as outs. So, I get more or less the right pot-odds?


Reply
Quote
ghaleon
Joined: 17.10.2007

I think turn is bad for us and we have option to check back and evaluate river. Villain is huge whale so at least he wont fold any better hand on turn. Some 9Txx, QJxx are fairly big portion of his range. Also this is sort of hand we kind of have to continue versus pot raise but its really not spot we want to be in. So check would make life easier and allow equity realization better. Pus we have some showdown value if turn and river goes to showdown. Winning some weaker two pairs. Villain can likely call quite a few weaker hands versus turn bet also so I suppose its not as back and white. I mean he called here with plain gutshot on flop so flush draw on turn is likely monster for him.

But I think just calling turn is still best and not shove. Q3 being best hand is really unlikely so unimproved folding river is likely best. Maybe bit trickier if we improve to top two with those pot odds. But I dont know if even this sort of player would think QJxx would be worth to raise turn.


Reply
Quote
Mascherano95
Joined: 09.10.2010

ott u have an odds call with 13 outs against the nutstraight so it is wp to the turn.

but the river is a raise.


Reply
Quote
Primrose6789
Joined: 01.07.2016

I think here Villain already went all in with his last chips on river.


Reply
Quote
Mascherano95
Joined: 09.10.2010

ok then it is wp


Reply
Quote