Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

NL16 6Max, protecting my range vs a reg

9 Posts
8 Users
5 Reactions
641 Views
Dr1fter808
Joined: 11.10.2017

The reg is 31/22/af1.6 3B:7.7 969 hands

What I am doing here is protecting my check calling range against someone that I play often against. So my plan here is to just call down his bets and I wanna show this hand down to protect myself from his bluffs and his value range. I would never do this vs weak players obviously.

And even if I go at him in this hand, I doubt I can get more than 15BB from him anyway.

PokerStars - $0.16 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 5 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

UTG: 106.81 BB
CO: 266.81 BB
BTN: 98.13 BB
SB: 103.06 BB
Hero (BB): 115.69 BB

SB posts SB 0.5 BB, Hero posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has T♥ T♠

UTG raises to 2.5 BB, fold, fold, fold, Hero calls 1.5 BB

Flop: (5.5 BB, 2 players) 4♠ 6♥ T♦
Hero checks, UTG bets 2.88 BB, Hero calls 2.88 BB

Turn: (11.25 BB, 2 players) K♣
Hero checks, UTG checks

River: (11.25 BB, 2 players) 9♠
Hero checks, UTG checks

Spoiler

Hero shows T♥ T♠ (Three of a Kind, Tens)
(Pre 67%, Flop 99.7%, Turn 100%)
UTG mucks Q♦ T♣ (One Pair, Tens)
(Pre 33%, Flop 0.3%, Turn 0%)
Hero wins 10.75 BB

Thoughts?


Reply
Quote
8 replies

Above hand id prefer protecting my raising range, and go for raise on the flop. If your confident in how someones playing i think a raising range including, pure bluff, semi bluff and obv nuts is more profitable. I wouldnt play scared vs regs as if they are less likely to want too play against you (high variance) and will build up more of LAG image making it easier to get paid off with value hands


Reply
Quote
Moderator
SDK1987
Joined: 12.11.2008

Pre-flop could be a 3bet against a LAG for value.
Flop check/call is fine. You don't need to protect your hand and if he has a over pair he has only 2 outs.
As played I would make a value bet on the river for sure.

Cheers,
SDK1987


Reply
Quote
KatalonacX
Joined: 22.11.2013

Viliain is on passive side,bet river 1|2pot for value against JJ,QQ, also Tx(AT-4com,Txs-4com).


Reply
Quote
CharlotteD
Joined: 04.02.2013

Bet the river.


Reply
Quote
Taroxus
Joined: 27.11.2018

Just take the most +EV option, which i think has to be XR


Reply
Quote
Dr1fter808
Joined: 11.10.2017

Thanks you all. Yeah, I change my mind. I'm not gonna do this anymore. It's just not necessary, imo.


Reply
Quote

I don't mind the check call on the flop apart from 98s villain doesn't really have any draws and villain might not open 44 utg and you block any Tx.Protecting your checking range and allowing villain to catch up makes sense on some flops but once villain checks the turn the river is a value bet imo.Villain can check back some Kx and might get sticking with 77 88 so we need to get some value on the river.Villain isn't checking the turn with KK and cant call a river check raise with Kx so check raising the river doesn't make much sense to me.Just make a smallish bet and target some weaker 1 pair hands and kx so like 1/3p maybe 1/2p imo


Reply
Quote
Sunrise1912
Joined: 24.11.2009

Betting the river is mandatory. If you check river - its to check raise, however, what hand would call your raise ? Only QJ that will shove over you. Every other value hand he might have like Kx/sets/two pair (highly unlikely) will bet the turn themselves

So, if he is a decent reg he would 1/3 the river with QQ/JJ/Tx for thin value and would fold to a raise - therefore you win 1/3 river bet.

now, if you bet 2/3 river - he still has to call all these hands, therefore - this is the most EV play imo - see in this case you would have won more on the river than check/raising.

As played he had exactly a hand that would have called you off - and it even turned out that he is more passive and would not valuebet Tx here - but be confident he would have called you the river.


Reply
Quote