Korns comment was that he had a feeling ♦
at 2+2 they didn't like it;
his argumentation for the river cap was that villain after his 3-bet had either the K
or a pure bluff, which would fold to his cap.
Btw, what do you think about that? ♦
2)
CO (25/18/2.90/32)
PartyPoker 3.00/6.00 Hold'em (5 handed) Recorded and converted with HandRecorder
Preflop: Hero is BB with 8♣ , K♦
1 folds, CO raises, 2 folds, Hero calls.
Flop: (4.33 SB) A♠ , 2♥ , 6♦ (2 players)
Hero checks, CO bets, Hero raises, CO 3-bets, Hero caps, CO calls.
Turn: (6.17 BB) 6♥ (2 players)
Hero bets, CO calls.
River: (8.17 BB) 4♦ (2 players)
Hero bets, CO folds.
Final Pot: 9.17 BB.
villain was a ps.de tag and after his flop 3-bet i "knew" he had a pocket pair and thought i cap it and lead the turn to maybe make him fold it. On the river i didn't think he could call another bet, since i would never value bet a pocket pair here.
Nuts or balls? ♦
This hand is totally overplayed but i just had that feeling myself.