Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

7$ | 6 max | pre | J7s

3 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
203 Views
Coach
maniac
Joined: 29.03.2006

hi,

I guess its just a spew. Its either bet flop or asplayed bet turn call raise fold river. Its a 3bet pot I should just let go I guess. If this were a limped pot it would be a different story

PokerStars - 80/160 Ante 20 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 3 players
Hand converted by Holdem Manager 3

BB: 4,454 (27.8 bb)
BTN: 1,136 (7.1 bb)
Hero (SB): 3,410 (21.3 bb)

3 players post ante of 20, Hero posts SB 80, BB posts 160

Pre Flop: (pot: 300) Hero has 7♠: J♠:
fold, Hero calls 80, BB raises to 480, Hero calls 320

Flop: (1,020, 2 players) T♦: J♥: 4♥:
Hero checks, BB checks

Turn: (1,020, 2 players) 6♣:
Hero bets 520, BB raises to 1,040, Hero raises to 2,910 and is all-in, BB calls 1,870

River: (6,840, 2 players) 9♥:

Spoiler

Results: 6,840 pot (0 rake)
Final Board: T♦: J♥: 4♥: 6♣: 9♥:

Hero shows 7♠: J♠:: (One Pair, Jacks)
(Pre 18%, Flop 20%, Turn 11%)

BB shows A♦: A♠:: (One Pair, Aces)
(Pre 82%, Flop 80%, Turn 89%)

BB wins 6,840


Reply
Quote
2 replies
ghaleon
Joined: 17.10.2007

Which sort of villain BB is? If we expect him to raise wide preflop versus limp I would not mind to just open fold. In general open fold would be too tight but this is bubble with clear mid stack situation. I would tighten considerably in this spot.

If villain is more passive limp-folding to 3bb raise would be fine.

As played I would just check again on turn to pot control with weak top pair. Tough spot when we bet and get minraise. Anyway line does look strong even though pretty weird one. Would imagine good amount of better hands would want to protect on this flop so his range should be somewhat capped. So probably fine to go either way but I think preflop choice is more important. I personally prefer to avoid marginal spots in this stack setup as we are quite ICM risk averse.


Reply
Quote
Coach
maniac
Joined: 29.03.2006

mee too. He was quite active but I didn't saw him raise over a limp. I think folding pre is fine. I like the passive approach due to the icm


Reply
Quote