Hi all,
I'm really enjoying my experience with PokerStrategy and applying the VERY VALUABLE lessons learned here in both my online and home-game play.
Unfortunately, I'm neither a high-stakes nor high-frequency player - online I play mostly $1+.25 SnG's, and average between 5-10 games a week.
This seems a comfortable balance for my work/family/leisure time and I'm not looking to increase my time at the tables. I am hungry to learn more about this game though. The problem is that playing at these stakes and frequencies I will never earn enough strategy points in the 4 week period to advance to the Silver rank and unlock those strategies. (I realize that as my bankroll builds I could progress to higher buy-ins and thus higher rakes, and thus earn strategy points quicker, but at my frequency of play this is still going to take a very, very long time - i.e. years.)
I was wondering what people think about setting certain Lifetime Strategy Point levels to reward long-time players who might not be able to provide the high cash influx to PS over short periods of time (i.e. 4-weeks), but over the long haul are still valuable contributors to the financial success of PS.
For instance at 1000 lifetime strategy points we earn the Elephant License, what if at another value we earned silver rank (or at least access to silver rank strategy material)..., and at another higher value - access to gold, etc...
A Possible Scale
400 Lifetime Strategy Points = Silver Rank
1000 Lifetime Strategy Points = Elephant License
1500 Lifetime Strategy Points = Gold Rank
3750 Lifetime Strategy Points = Platinum Rank
A Possible Rationale
For example, it seems to me that for the Elephant License (1000 Lifetime Strategy points) a player has to generate between $300 and $500 of rake (depending on poker room). So 1000 Strategy points equates to about roughly $400 of rake generated.
To go from Bronze to Silver requires between 100 and 799 Strategy Points over a 4-week period (or between roughly $40 to $320 of rake generated)... PS's hope is that this level of rake generation is sustained, which for my example will never occur. So we could determine a reasonable equivalent Lifetime Requirement - I would suggest half of the maximum 4-week requirement - in this case 400 points.
For somebody like me, it'll still take 2 years to obtain this many points, but in the meantime I've still generated hundreds of dollars of rake for PS and at least I'll know that someday I'll be able to access new strategies to employ.
I don't want something for nothing, I really do believe that the material PS has to offer is valuable. It would be up to PS to decide what they thought was a fair lifetime contribution to unlock this material with their members. The numbers I provided are just a starting point for the discussion.
What do you think?
