Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

3-bet pot, too nitty to fold top pair here?

7 Posts
7 Users
2 Reactions
904 Views
Casey55
Joined: 19.07.2010

PokerStars, Hold'em No Limit - $0.01/$0.02 - 6 players
Hand delivered by Upswing Poker

UTG: $1.64 (82 bb)
MP: $5.75 (288 bb)
CO (Hero): $5.28 (264 bb)
BU: $2.03 (102 bb)
SB: $1.02 (51 bb)
BB: $1.92 (96 bb)

Pre-Flop: ($0.03) Hero is CO with 9 9
1 fold, MP raises to $0.05, Hero 3-bets to $0.16, 3 players fold, MP calls $0.11

Flop: ($0.35) 6 2 4 (2 players)
MP checks, Hero bets $0.17, MP calls $0.17

Turn: ($0.69) 7 (2 players)
MP bets $0.22, (Hero)...?


Reply
Quote
6 replies
EmiyaKiritsugu
Joined: 13.08.2013

Indeed folding overpair to less than 1/3 pot bet is super nitty. Without info I would call and see what happens on river. BTW that donk can be nice exploit against people who abuse cbet because they end up on turn with a lot of missed broadways.


Reply
Quote
krys94
Joined: 04.06.2012

I would bet much more on flop... even pot, but on turn you cant rlly fold his small bet...


Reply
Quote
Moderator
SDK1987
Joined: 12.11.2008

Originally posted by krys94
I would bet much more on flop... even pot, but on turn you cant rlly fold his small bet...

What's the reason for Cbet pot the flop? Only against a calling station I would consider it.

Cheers,
SDK1987


Reply
Quote
LMcrow
Joined: 15.08.2006

rangebetting half pot or 1/3 is standard otf. Call turn vs. 1/3 donk with overpair is standard. So yes its too nitty to fold.


Reply
Quote

Should be a pretty simple call i'm not sure how often we should be raising but we should probably have some raises vs this size turn donk.But given it's vs MP's range in a 3bet pot and the lack of turned draws i think calling is likely the best line here


Reply
Quote
4zbuk4RNMD
Joined: 29.12.2009

I agree with others. It is call. This can be often blocking bet and guy wants to go cheap on river, because he may expect higher 2nd barell from you instead. As a bonus to get cheap on river, sometimes nitty players just fold his low bet.


Reply
Quote