Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

PLO20 AAJJrb 3-way SPR2

6 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
280 Views
Mascherano95
Joined: 09.10.2010

iPoker - €0.20 PL Hi (6 max) - Omaha Hi - 6 players
Hand converted by Holdem Manager 3

CO: €7.47 (37.4 bb)
BTN: €15.89 (79.5 bb)
Hero (SB): €20.00 (100 bb)
BB: €19.61 (98.1 bb)
UTG: €29.17 (145.9 bb)
MP: €21.52 (107.6 bb)

Hero posts SB €0.10, BB posts €0.20

Pre Flop: (pot: €0.30) Hero has A♠: A♦: J♣: J♥:
UTG raises to €0.70, fold, CO calls €0.70, fold, Hero raises to €3.00, fold, UTG calls €2.30, CO calls €2.30

Flop: (€9.20, 3 players) 5♥: K♦: 3♣:
Hero checks, UTG bets €4.60, CO calls €4.47,

Spoiler

Hero raises to €17.00, UTG calls €12.40

Overplay with my AA? Flop is dry, there can be some Kxxx combos around whereas set is not so likely I thought. CO is a regular whereas UTG is a (50/5) loose passive player.

Turn: (€47.67, 3 players) 8♥:

River: (€47.67, 3 players) T♠:

Results: €47.67 pot (€1.00 rake)
Final Board: 5♥: K♦: 3♣: 8♥: T♠:

UTG shows 5♠: 5♣: 7♣: 7♦:: (Three of a Kind, Fives)
Main Pot: [€22.61]: (Pre 30%, Flop 67%, Turn 78%)
Side Pot: [€25.06]: (Pre 37%, Flop 79%, Turn 89%)

CO shows K♥: T♣: 3♠: 8♣:: (Two Pair, Kings and Tens)
Main Pot: [€22.61]: (Pre 20%, Flop 13%, Turn 11%)

Hero mucks A♠: A♦: J♣: J♥:: (One Pair, Aces)
Main Pot: [€22.61]: (Pre 49%, Flop 21%, Turn 11%)
Side Pot: [€25.06]: (Pre 63%, Flop 21%, Turn 11%)

UTG wins €46.67


Reply
Quote
5 replies
Moderator
SDK1987
Joined: 12.11.2008

Tricky flop multi way and is dry. I would most likely Cbet and fold to a raise for value. If you check you play a guessing game with AAJJ and it's hard to improve if you are behind.

Cheers,
SDK1987


Reply
Quote
Coach
Kyyberi
Joined: 09.07.2010

If they haven't looked their cards (meaning UTG would bet his whole range and CO would call his whole range) you would have a bit under 40% equity. As UTG probably never folds there, as he bet into shorty (meaning he has something for sure), you need 36% equity for the whole pot to stack off. Now when they both have connected with the board, you will have way less than 40% there, which should make this an easy fold.

It's kind of a scenario where we could find them hands that gives you that required equity, but it would be a bit hard. Classical situation where the best case scenario is break evenish, and rest are -EV.

SPR 2 is tricky, and effectively we are playing just against UTG (as CO is short and we don't really care about him). If this was just a HU pot, I would most likely just pot and get it in as that shouldn't connect with UTG range that often. So in here I think pot is just fine. But if you check and that action happens, I would fold.


Reply
Quote
Mascherano95
Joined: 09.10.2010

According to solver we are not potting 100% of our AAxx though, he is mixing it up and I did not figure it out yet how much of our AA to bet and which to check.. I agree that when checked against a call and the self-committing bet our Equity is too poor. It´s a tricky spot where I repeatedly make this mistake. SPR seems to be small but the hand-strength requirements 3-way are still kinda high.


Reply
Quote
Coach
Kyyberi
Joined: 09.07.2010

In "normal" UTG vs SB spot, SPR 3,5 solver likes to bet half a pot and stack off vs raise on this board. If it was 100bb 3way spot, solver would check and fold to a bet+call. But here we have SPR 2 and a short stack. With SPR 2 I would not use small sizing, just pot.

Mathematically versus one opponent we can happily stack off with AA always at SPR 2 or lower. So in this spots my default is to stack off on all dry or semi-dry flops, and then on more wet boards if I have any piece of it.


Reply
Quote
Mascherano95
Joined: 09.10.2010

Yea I did not mean Solver potting but betting in general.

Mathematically versus one opponent we can happily stack off with AA always at SPR 2 or lower. So in this spots my default is to stack off on all dry or semi-dry flops, and then on more wet boards if I have any piece of it.

Yeah.. I do the same heds-up.


Reply
Quote