Known players:
[tg]Position_Stack:hands/vp$ip/RaisePreflop/AF/WTS/ORL/BBvsSteal/W$SD;Hero$25,00:///////;MP2$25,00:20/5/5/2,0/0/0/-/-;[/tg]
0,1/0,25 No-Limit Hold'em (8 handed)
Hand recorder used for this poker hand: PokerStrategy Elephant 0.67 by www.pokerstrategy.com.
Preflop: Hero is SB with J♦, J♣
2 folds, MP2 raises to $1,00, 3 folds, Hero calls $0,90, BB folds.
Flop: ($2,25) 6♥, 3♦, 2♠ (2 players)
Hero checks, MP2 bets $1,50, Hero raises to $4,50
------------------------
I don't think i had 20 hands sample before this hand, or i overlooked it. Anyway, i called preflop because if i'd 3bet i think i'd just isolate myself against range that crushes me since i treat all unknown fullstacked players as TAGs so my plan was basically call and go broke on safe flop where he could be going broke with wider range (than the one which could call 3bet PF) of which many hands i'd beat or try and get a cheap SD at not good flops. but basically after reviewing this hand it just looks like i'd be representing sets on such flops (esp w c/r line) and it's bad since i don't want to be representing stronger hands than i actually hold when i am trying to get money in. On the other side i don't like c/c flop because if turn is a scare card and he barrels again i'm lost again. Any thoughts?