AA against check raise at the turn

It's villain depended, but readless on NL2 a shove for value isn't to crazy I think.
Off course villain min raise on the turn could be a tell of a monster. This time it cost him/her value with that move. If I have 77 I would jam the turn most likely.

Cheers,
SDK1987

Dear SDK1987,
I don't understand your meaning for the word "jam" also with translator I don't understand. Can you please describe in other words what you would do when you have 77 at that turn?

Best regards,
kingdollar

Other than minor bet sizing differences, I wouldn't change much preflop and on the flop. You could raise preflop with 4bb due to the limper (1+3), the flop bet should have been 1/3 pot size.
Just as SDK1987 says I would reraise all-in on the turn and expect to be winning most of the time on NL2.

I recommend looking into https://forums.pokerstrategy.com/forum/thread.php?threadid=544931 as it helped me move from NL2 to NL10 in the past months.

Jam in poker is another name go all in. Do in that case SDK1987 with 77 here on the turn he raise all in (put all money in pot). On board are two flush draws, straight draws van be too.
But vs pot size bet on flop with 77 should check-fold here.

Originally posted by kingdollar
Dear SDK1987,
I don't understand your meaning for the word "jam" also with translator I don't understand. Can you please describe in other words what you would do when you have 77 at that turn?

Best regards,
kingdollar

Jam is indeed another word for shoving and going all-inn.

Hi SDK1987,
thank you for the answer.
Best regards,
kingdollar

Originally posted by kingdollar
Hi SDK1987,
thank you for the answer.
Best regards,
kingdollar

Your welcome and have a nice day.

Too drawy board, I would put money in and I dont care that I would lose whole stack. Board is dynamic and you benefit from denying equity.