Btw, i don't know how to sort out the information how it's usually seen on the forum 
blinds 0.01/0.02
I was CO he was BU
I had JJ
raise 0.08
He calls
Flop
Q 
Q 
4
I check
He bets 0.12
I call
Turn
3
River
2
He shows 5 :spade:5 
So ok i took the risk by calling 0.12 but i had a feeling that he was bluffing mainly due to past hands(proved to be right)
Tested his bluff by betting a fairly small amount of 0.06 and he called so i felt that he had a weaker hand than QQQ or QQQQ
Betted 0.06 again on the river and surely enough he called
So he shows 55 and i show JJ
Then he says after the hand, that i over valued my JJ which i can understand because i can see how what i did could have been a mistake however, when i said that he contradicted himself due to the fact that he, imo, over valued the 55 too by calling both 0.06 bets he said no.
Now the question is, did he over value his 55 as badly as i over valued my JJ?