[Closed] I just can't stand it...

Well its easy to overestimate your edge against bad players that go too far in a hand. The problem with this is that often weak hands have more equity than you first think, many of the mistakes loose players make are much less horrible as you would intuitivly think. Furthermore its often correct to play relatively loose in PLO as you can see very well demonstrated in Highstakes games which are extremly loose. That said most of those loose players on the low limits are still pretty bad but you cant profit from them as extremly as you might think or wish.
If the hands you posted are played well most of the time its probably normal variance for the most part.

PLO & Stars isn't the best combination. Worse is only Everest + PLO.

What do you mean ?

I play Hold'em on Stars. It's going nice, can't complain. But whenever I play PLO I'm losing big b/c my opponents just can't fold and they can't miss the river.
When I play PLO on Betfair I'm winning. When I play PLO on onGame I'm winning. But PLO on Stars looks quite rigged to me, lol.

Maybe it's variance (some guy at 2p2 showed graph where he dropped 3k BB in one day and then grinded it back to breakeven 11k hands)? Where's your EV line at?

Really really high but I don't mind, I cashed out all my bankroll, I just could'nt stand it. I'll finish my bonus on Pacific Poker and then I'll see.

It would be nice to see your showdown and non-showdown winnings. I find that pure aggression simply doesn't work in loose/aggressive games, while loose/passive playstyle is much more profitable. And in loose/passive games, you should be tight/aggressive instead of loose/aggressive - and this might explain why your games over stars haven't gone so well, because the game tends to be looser and more passive than the games over Full Tilt.

10k hands is small samplesize though, but you should consider avoiding marginal situations postflop and fold more often to preflop raises instead of trying to play from position, because as people have mentioned, people do not know how to fold in microstakes -> reduces your chances stealing pots from position.

You're right, but I defenately stopped playing Omaha at Pokerstars. Now, I'm just playing lots of DoN 1$ to clear that bonus (should be done easily).

I still play Omaha (but PL50) at Pacific Poker and I'm doing very well (50$ to 700$).

That you are winning doesn´t necessarily mean you are playing good.
in PLO u can suffer huge swings.
If u´r using HEM Omaha u should alwayls analyse your hands and figure out if u put it in ahead.

It´s even possible that u do it alright
and still lose over some k hands.

So don´t go crazy about dropping some money and always work on ur game!

If u don´t now it yet take a look at:
http://www.propokertools.com/
and put in some of your all-in hands
it helps alot in omaha to know ur equity

Originally posted by Zheelvern
I play Hold'em on Stars. It's going nice, can't complain. But whenever I play PLO I'm losing big b/c my opponents just can't fold and they can't miss the river.
When I play PLO on Betfair I'm winning. When I play PLO on onGame I'm winning. But PLO on Stars looks quite rigged to me, lol.

thats why you play for nuts, and since they cant fold, you will get paid. (almoust) dont play non-nuts, and you will be fine.

I play PLO at stars, and like it