Skip to forum
Tightness Vs passiv...
 
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] Tightness Vs passiveness

3 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
598 Views
Cpwpoker
Joined: 04.06.2009

I'm a pretty much passive player and i think it is one of my major flaw.

So i would like to have your advice about tight/passive Vs tight/aggressive.

Which is better?And why?

Yesterday after losing some bucks i decided to play aggressive - raising every hand i play preflop - this does not mean playing every hand but i fold if there is a raise before me when i dont have a strong hand and raise when i want to play a hand and no raise before me.Continuation bet on flop.And c/f on turn river if the villain follows.This was pretty successful as i get my money lost back + a profit of 1 BI XP

This question may be stupid but i'm a fish who want to swim like a shark in the futur so want to know your view about being passive and aggressive.


2 replies
jonnyjm
Joined: 24.03.2008

Aggresion = Value = profit

Also agression makes your opponents make the dessisions rather than you. There must be a reasson behind every bet though.

Passive = checking/calling = very little value = lossing

you win less hands and smaller pots etc...need i say more?


Cpwpoker
Joined: 04.06.2009

Thanks for your answer.

Will try to keep that in mind !