Originally posted by Djvandal
BSS = more rakeback you are playing more pots
On Pokerstars it doesn't matter whether you fold preflop or see the showdown with your hand, every player gets the same amount of points. I'm not sure about other sites, but there is no way you get more rakeback playing BSS with a limited bankroll (which makes you play lower limits with BSS).
As an example lets say we have a bankroll of ~$800 and we play at Pokerstars.
That allows us to play either:
MTTs up to $8 BI, mostly we will play $5 MTTs as there are more of them. I think that we certainly won't play more than 5 MTTs per hour (even if we multitable about 10 tables, it will take 2 hours on average to bust out of a MTT, this is just an estimation, but it won't be 10x more or less).
That gives us 5*0.80 = $4 fee per hour, which is 20 VPPs per hour.
Turbo SNGs with $15 BI. I think that we can't play more than 20 of them per hour if we ~10table. That gives us $20 fee, which is 100 VPPs per hour.
BSS with 30 BI rule means that we can play NL25. I don't have good data on this because when I played this limit, the VPP system here way different and we got close to zero points. It's way better now, my estimation is that you get about 30 VPPs per hour, as you play about 500 hands when you multitable up to 10 tables. If someone plays NL25 on Stars, let me know if this number is way too low or high, but I'm actually pretty confident that it's not FAR from reality.
With SSS we have 40 stacks for NL100 and you get 130 VPPs per hour, if you play about 500 hands (if you multitable up to 10 tables).
You can see that if you go for rakeback (FPPs for Porshe or PS points for Diamond status), then SSS > SNGs > BSS > MTTs.
Also take into account, that it is really easy to multitable SSS, relatively easy to multitable SNGs (but a bit harder in my opinion) and way harder to multitable BSS and MTTs. This (and the fact, that you actually play a little bit more than 50 hands per hour on 1 table) only enhances the fact, that SSS >> SNGs >> BSS > MTTs.
I'm pretty good example of this. I have played different types of NLHE and I got no points for playing MTTs/BSS. With SNGs I was easily Gold member here while playing only about 8 SNGs per hour, while with SSS (which I'm playing now) I'm getting enough points to be a Diamond member.
Also take into consideration that this is only true for low/mid stake games because the situation changes a lot on high stakes. The reason is a cap on rake, the maximum rake is $3 and if you play say NL1k+ nearly every pot is raked maximum as soon as the flop is dealt so it doesn't matter any more whether you play this stake BSS or even higher stake (if there are some tables running) SSS, it still holds though that you can easily multitable SSS which gives you more rake and rakeback.
Even more important thing to consider on higher stakes is that while rake in cash games is capped at $3 per pot, fee in SNGs is not really capped. Therefore playing high stakes SNGs gives you way more rakeback than pretty much anything else.
But since I believe that high stakes players know this already and/or are able to figure it out by themselves, I made the example above for low/middle stake players who consider to get Dimond members here, or Supernova on Stars or want to generate some rake for whatever reason.