GAME #-1750823468: Texas Hold'em NL Tournament 2009-10-01 13:39:42
Table "Turbo" $30 NLH Double Up, 348436361, 3024284021 (Tournament: "Turbo" $20 NLH Double Up Buy-In: $30+$3)
Seat 1: SuperSeanE ($1,170.00 in chips)
Seat 6: rouxy14 ($1,030.00 in chips)
Seat 8: ukrarts ($1,590.00 in chips)
Seat 10: SickAlek ($5,210.00 in chips) DEALER
SuperSeanE: Post SB $150.00
rouxy14: Post BB $300.00
HOLE CARDS
Dealt to SuperSeanE [DK SK]
ukrarts: Fold
SickAlek: Raise (NF) $5,210.00
SuperSeanE: Fold
rouxy14: Fold
SUMMARY
Total pot $5,660.00 Rake $0.00
SickAlek: wins $5,660.00
What do you think? I always pass here and I have a 6% roi over 1000s of games. I play 9-12 tables and therefore I have set strategies to allow for me to be able to cope with all tables and maintina the same level of poker as I can achieve while playing say 2-3 tables.
One of these strategies is that i never comit myself all in on the bubble if one stack is way shorter than mine. In this circumstance the bb who is the short stack is a player with a -roi of 12% according to my sharkscope HUD over 500 games. He does not understand bubble play and tends to move all in far to often in bad situations such as moving with 37 into a bb with the massive chip lead.
I hate to call this all in and lose and bubble when I know that the shorter stack on the bb will have to do something before me and survive it before im commited.
Further the all in mover is a dumb regualar who breaks even. I have notes on him that he moves with any stack in any position with any ace or any pair at all blind levels- wierd player but he range is very defined.
What do you think?