Hi Guys ,
I've a concern I wanna share.
For some time now I've been playing on NL5 at FT. For all the time I spent there, I'm constantly loosing. Naturally maybe a little more than half of the losses are caused by me not being able to let go of a hand or whatever, but in the cases I do have a strong hand I get outplayed, suck out on, or outdrawn by other unbelievable players who call against their odds.
Even though this may sound as something that many people have said before, I can't seem to be able to play a logical game on those limits. After making some research at PokerTableRatings I found out that the most winning players at those limits, play a lot tighter (10%-30% tighter) than an average player using the SHC in the bronze section per se, not to mention the other SHC's that are in the silver section.
So my question to all of you playing microstakes is, to beat NL5 or NL10 is it profitable to play by those SHCs, or is it better to be close to Nit, and play 6-7 tables, thus win only from premium hands and rakeback ?
Your thoughts are much appreciated because after some 50K hands on those micro-stakes I still get crushed like a bug.
Thanks in advance.