OK, I've read more poker strategy in the last year than I care to admit to anyone outside of the poker community. I know the theory behind a good game, I know that variance exists and that it can be brutal. Of course I know, because I've read it hundreds of times from hundreds of different sources and every single one, basically, has said DON'T UNDERESTIMATE VARIANCE.
So why then do I always underestimate variance? I guess a lot of others are in the same boat, maybe I'm just not cut out for poker.
I've played like 4000 sng's, 100's of MTT's and easily 200k hands of cash. I do well for long stretches of small peaks and troughs but with a steady increase to my account then BOOM. I can't win a hand for what seems like an eternity... I'm thinking that suddenly I don't know how to play, everything I do is wrong, maybe my success was just positive variance and actually I just suck at poker.
The problem is, I play micro's with a real abc game so surely I can beat these in the long run...
I look at the stats of serious grinders, they beat whatever game with a small roi or bb\hands ratio but they play like 20-30 tables and turn a decent profit... They must be playing an abc game... They don't have time for reads or funny stuff, just straight forward rely on everyone else making more mistakes than them over 1000's of hands.
So how the hell do these people and all other long term profitable players deal with variance and just how bad does it get?