For some reason the thread where I just asked the question was locked
I still want to know the answer, though
Or is this some kind of taboo topic?
The question about real-life profitability of SSS has started to bother me as well after yesterday. I played 1000+ hands of NL10, lost 7$ and started to go through statistics to find leaks. I knew that I did one obvious mistake - at one moment of weakness I decided to slowplay pocket aces and that cost me 2$, but there should be more. I looked through all the lost hands and couldn't find any... and then I started to think:
They say that win rate for SSS is 0.5-2.0BB/100hands. OK, lets say its the 1,5 BB/100h. So in my 1000-hand session I should win on average 1,5$, right?
Wait a second! ![]()
That's if I am playing perfectly! If we take into account that a mistake in SSS will cost you all stack (2$ in average) then, according to this info I am allowed to make no more than 1(!) mistake in 1000 hands. If I happen to make two, then I am doomed to neverending downswing!
If I am understanding it right, then there is no point in playing SSS unless you have some bonus to clear or a rakeback deal in effect, because nobody is perfect, and there always be some mistakes?
So? Can I get a straight answer to this? Is SSS a "perfect strategy for a beginner" only because I will lose less than by playing any other strategy? Is there any reason to think that SSS can be profitable without any bonuses and rakebacks?
Or... the only way how to actually make money in SSS is to succesfully steal blinds and to perfect postflop freeplay when on BB?!
I would really appreciate an answer from someone who knows what he is talking about , not just some "I have played SSS for X amount of hands and it works just fine!" gibberish, because I dont want to waste my time practising something what can brake me even at best
I'd rather switch to playing SnGs then...
Thank you in advance!