Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] AKs multiway postflop

4 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
308 Views

Poker Stars, $3 + $0.40 NL Hold'em Tournament, 10/20 Blinds, 9 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

BTN: 1,500
SB: 1,500
BB: 1,500
UTG: 1,500
UTG+1: 1,500
UTG+2: 1,500
MP1: 1,500
Hero (MP2): 1,500
CO: 1,500

Pre-Flop: (30) K♥ A♥ dealt to Hero (MP2)
2 folds, UTG+2 calls 20, MP1 folds, Hero raises to 100, CO calls 100, 3 folds, UTG+2 calls 80

Flop: (330) 9♠ J♥ 6♥ (3 Players)
UTG+2 bets 80, Hero calls 80, CO raises to 160, UTG+2 calls 80, Hero calls 80

Turn: (810) A♣ (3 Players)
UTG+2 checks, Hero checks, CO bets 240, UTG+2 folds, Hero calls 240

River: (1,290) 6♠ (2 Players)
Hero checks, CO bets 1,000 and is All-In, Hero calls 1,000 and is All-In

Hi everyone,

Against unknown, no reads.. Did I play the hand well?? How would u have played it?

Any feedback is highly appreciated..


3 replies

raise the flop. we have 2 overs + the nut FD + backdoor broadway draw against a very weak bet from someone who limp/called pre.

We are only in bad shape against a set and even then we have 35% equity, best case we are crushing worse draws . we have a tonne of FE.

im getting it all in on this flop every time, so raise/call

you played this hand very passively.


_Anonymous_ Topic starter
_Anonymous_

Originally posted by lessthanthreee
you played this hand very passively.

Yeah.. because I thought that I should be much more risk-averse in early stage even with a very strong draw like (possible) 2 overcards and flush draw or like open-ended flush draw.. I guess that's the only reason that I played (or mostly play) this hand this way... hmm :O..


you have no reason to be overly risk-averse. you are so far away from the bubble that ICM implications are minimal. just look for good spots to accumulate chips with good equity. this is one of those spots


Share: