Skip to forum
Search
tigerK
tigerK
@tigerk
Forum Home   |   Recent Posts
Estimable Member
Joined: October 14, 2008
Profile Activity
Topics: 5 / Replies: 112
AllTopicsReplies
Reply

I would have shoved preflop here. as played, NH.

17 years ago
Forum
Hand discussions for No Limit
Reply

Tough spot. I wouldn't have played this hand in the same way, but as played, I would have fold to his reraise flop cause it smells nuts here. I...

17 years ago
Forum
Hand discussions for No Limit
Reply

fold.

17 years ago
Forum
Hand discussions for No Limit
Reply

fold. KQs is too bad for making such a moove. You're just in NL50, wait higher limits for being tricky. This is a high variance moove. You don�...

17 years ago
Forum
Hand discussions for No Limit
Reply

Obvious push river, it was the only right choice with your line. As I'm concerned I would have slowplay my nuts on the flop, playing check/call...

17 years ago
Forum
Hand discussions for No Limit
Reply

With such reads, it looks like an easy shove imho. To say the truth I do use this moove quite often with flush draw OOP with bad odds against aggro ...

17 years ago
Forum
Hand discussions for No Limit
Reply

You'd rather c-bet here as I'm concerned. Cause it will be quite hard to extract value from underpaire on this kind of board, even by slowp...

17 years ago
Forum
Hand discussions for No Limit
Reply

That's a tough spot. His betsizing doesn't make sense, if he had something here (pair on the flop, small pp) he should have protected more...

17 years ago
Forum
Hand discussions for No Limit
Reply

I would have call here. That's a good spot. 6% of 3-bet that's pretty much isn't it?. What is the %foldto3bet of UTG? You didn't...

17 years ago
Forum
Hand discussions for No Limit
Reply

I disagree, for me this hand is not well played at all. Pre-flop your call OOP is horrible. You have just one right alternative: push or fold. I don&...

17 years ago
Forum
Hand discussions for No Limit
Reply

That's why I would take great value from you.

17 years ago
Forum
Hand discussions for No Limit
Reply

I didn't play midstakes on ftp but I would like to say that even on pokerstars, where there's quite a nice traffic (equivalent to ftp i woul...

17 years ago
Forum
Hand discussions for No Limit
Reply

I do check behind here cause I can check behind as well with AA, AK on this spot. It's my opinion that auto c-bet is a mistake. But If you alwa...

17 years ago
Forum
Hand discussions for No Limit
Reply

Ok I understand. That's nice to play without stats I guess in NL600 I should try this site. How are you doing there? Is there many tables? After...

17 years ago
Forum
Hand discussions for No Limit
Reply

I would have delay my c-bet here. Check/behind flp. If he checks again turn, I bet. If he bets turn, regarding his betsizing i would call or fold (mid...

17 years ago
Forum
Hand discussions for No Limit
Page 4 / 8