Shorthanded Play at $60 SNGs

  • Sit and Go
  • SNG
  • $55 - $75
  • Shorthanded
(9 Votes) 5166


Free membership

Join now


Collin Moshman reviews his recent play at the $60 SNG level with an emphasis on shorthanded play and interesting spots


HH Review Shorthanded

Comments (9)

newest first
  • mortal1ty


    please make this gold, pretty pretty please with cherry on top
  • Tim64


    12:00 vs a reg you said you would consider either "checking back or shoving flop for double pot". Would you plan to balance this with shoving AQ/QQ as well?
  • CollinMoshman


    #1 Mortal1ty: It's not my decison to make, but hope it happens for you :)

    #2 Tim64: Probably not. I'd be shoving a few hands in the AK category (too strong to b/f, too weak to b/c), and then having a balanced range for smaller cbets of hands that were clear b/f or b/c's.
  • Tim64


    Thanks. Very high quality product, as usual!
  • CollinMoshman


  • madein1984


    19:35 would you consider having a small 3betting range to 900 here with premiums and those small offsuite Aces, that you don't want to reshove? I assume it's a spot where regs could make significant mistakes by overadjusting, espacially calling the 3bet too wide and then giving up too many flops or in general folding too much to the 3bet. Postflop plan would be to b/f small with the small Aces if we hit less than 2pair, and b/c with nuts on most boards.
  • madein1984


    21:03 that A8o is superbad, -2.2
    QTs reshove is +.13, loosening up the BU range it's +.19. If BB called correctly (TT+, AK, AQs, and even AQo being -.41), then BU should only overcall with JJ+, AKs (AKo being breakeven).
  • CollinMoshman


    #6/#7 Madein1984:

    19:35: That's definitely a good approach, of having a small 3bet range of blocker hands not good enough to 3bet shove and premiums we're looking to induce. At one point it would have been very profitable to 3bet/fold very wide here. But 4bet shove ranges have widened a lot and I think against any strong reg, it's important to be at least pretty close to balanced.

    Very good suggestion though.

    21:03: I agree this is a significant mistake.
  • termo1980


    Thanks CollinMoshman....