# Isolation with SSS - Part 3/3

- NL SSS
- NL SSS
- Fullring

(10 Votes)
7329
## Description

In the final part of the series, Xarry2 talks about isolation raises against two opponents and about isolation raises with speculative hands.

## Comments (23)

newest first#1

#2

#3

#4

#5

#6

#7

#8

#9

One note tho: A6o hand which you consider pushing @ 31:15

You're calculating with 12$ deadmoney while there is actually 22$ (limper's call). Might become a +EV push by that.

#10

#11

What kind of formula do have in Excel? where we can get them? \ А что у него за формулы в Экселе? где бы такие раздобыть...

How is possible to use all this stuff when you play several tables?!?! только у меня вопрос как это все использовать когда играешь несколько столов?!?!? и так не всегда успеваешь посмотреть в эквиляторе даже

#12

#13

I think the way I determine the EV may be confusing. If you take a close look at the formula I use you see that the field "deadmoney" just appears in the part which descirbes what I can win if the limper calls. I count the effective stack + deadmoney, and since the 1BB limp is already included in the eff. stack I just count the remaining SB+BB-rake.

I hope this was instructive enough :) if not just ask again.

best regards,

xarry

#14

#15

Havent had the time to calculate it myself yet, but I believe the formula might have a small flaw if it doesnt take all the money into account we might win without a viallain's call.

#16

the deadmoney is very interesting indeed. as far as I can see it is included. just take a look at the calculation again and you'll see that the SB, the BB and the limp are included in the formula when the limper folds.

EV = Pot*Foldequity + ...

pot is 25$ and there the limp is included. effective deadmoney is however just 12$ (in case the limper calls our push) which you can find in the (eff. stack+deadmoney)*... expression

its best if you calculate it as well in your own way, so we can compare and see wether there's a difference or not.

best regards,

xarry

#17

Kind regards,

Myth

#18

#19

#20

#21

PRPN80, у меня есть табличка ета.

#22

One thing I didn't understand in part 3 was the QTs isolation raise after 7 minutes. QTs is not the strongest value hand and you already have 2 opponents in the hand and the BB is quite loose (which you didn't mention). Can you explain this hand further?

#23

BB is loose passive dus kan het zijn dat ie coldcalled maar met een range waarin QTs meestal andere handen dominate like Q9s, JT, T9

Ikzelf zou gewoon meegelimpt hebben door de stacksize en positie