0.05/0.10 Fixed-Limit Hold'em (9 handed)
Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Texas Grab'em by www.pokerstrategy.cc.
Preflop: Hero is UTG+2 with 2♠, 2♦
UTG+1 folds, Hero calls, 2 folds, MP3 calls, CO raises, BU calls, SB folds, BB calls, Hero calls, MP3 calls.
Flop: (10.40 SB) 2♣, 3♦, 7♠ (5 players)
BB checks, Hero bets, MP3 calls, CO raises, BU folds, BB calls, Hero calls, MP3 calls.
Turn: (9.20 BB) 7♦ (4 players)
BB checks, Hero checks, MP3 bets, CO raises, BB folds, Hero 3-bets, MP3 calls, CO calls.
River: (18.20 BB) 5♥ (3 players)
Hero bets, MP3 raises, CO calls, Hero 3-bets, MP3 caps, CO calls.
Final Pot: 26.40 BB
Results follow (highlight to see):
MP3 shows [ 5c, 5s ] a full house, Fives full of Sevens
CO shows [ 8c, Ks ] a pair of Sevens
Hero shows [ 2s, 2d ] a full house, Twos full of Sevens
Hero wins $0.16 with a full house, Twos full of Sevens.
MP3 wins $2.38 with a full house, Fives full of Sevens.
Ich glaube, das war richtig gespielt:
Am Flop wollte ich
a) for value betten und dann
b) die Initiative bei CO belassen um ihn am Turn zu check-raisen (und MP3 nicht mit 3 bets zu konfrontieren);
und war - abgesehen vom "cap" am Ende des Rivers- immer noch der Meinung, jetzt viel Geld zu gewinnen (3-bet for value).
Was meint Ihr?
