Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] !English pokerstrategy needs another PROFESSIONAL JUDGES!

37 Posts
17 Users
0 Reactions
7,443 Views

Originally posted by Kruppe
stop posting so many hands ;)

Nice motivational speech....


Talic Topic starter
Talic
Joined: 04.01.2008
PokerStrategist

Originally posted by kukkiwonBG

Originally posted by Kruppe
stop posting so many hands ;)

Nice motivational speech....

I play much&bad -> I post much

for SoyCD: Darkonebg is doing great work


Originally posted by Talic
for SoyCD: Darkonebg is doing great work

+1


Jumbles
Joined: 06.10.2007
Oldschool Grinder

Post your hands here: https://www.pokerstrategy.com/forum/thread.php?postid=256270 .

At least you know they'll be done tomorrow ;).


darkonebg
Joined: 17.01.2008
Oldschool Grinder

Kaitz is back, relax all :)
Thanks for the feedback btw


Start analyzing your hands yourself, use active learning instead of passive ;) I didn't notice any problems with hand judges btw, seems like they are judging pretty fast and I'd say too fast ;D Need argumented judgements! :)


Originally posted by Balanarm
Need argumented judgements!

That will be even nicer...


Originally posted by kukkiwonBG

Originally posted by Balanarm
Need argumented judgements!

That will be even nicer...

Ye, I just checked the forums and had to critisize some darkonegb judgements, it's not because I want critics obv., I do it for my own logical thinking and active poker learning aspect, but wrong non-argumented judgements can really misslead many beginners.


TheBrood
Joined: 17.07.2008
PokerStrategist

Originally posted by kukkiwonBG

Originally posted by Balanarm
Need argumented judgements!

That will be even nicer...

Agreed


SoyCD
Joined: 20.02.2008
Oldschool Grinder

Originally posted by Balanarm

Originally posted by kukkiwonBG

Originally posted by Balanarm
Need argumented judgements!

That will be even nicer...

Ye, I just checked the forums and had to critisize some darkonegb judgements, it's not because I want critics obv., I do it for my own logical thinking and active poker learning aspect, but wrong non-argumented judgements can really misslead many beginners.

This is actually very important. Posting hands and having them analysed will help you to a certain extent..

But actually actively analysing other people's hands and arguing with judges will further your analytical thinking and force you to explore new levels of poker understanding. So I can only recommend everyone to not only post hands - but also to get involved in the discussion of hands in the forum.

On a side note this thread seems to have garnered some more voluntary hand judge applications - and together with Firsttsunami taking over the Hand Evaluation area I think we can see a lot more judging activity in the near future. I hope we also see a lot more strategy discussion as well :)

Best regards
SoyCD


darkonebg
Joined: 17.01.2008
Oldschool Grinder

Originally posted by Balanarm
Start analyzing your hands yourself, use active learning instead of passive ;) I didn't notice any problems with hand judges btw, seems like they are judging pretty fast and I'd say too fast ;D Need argumented judgements! :)

The reason most of the hands look like judged "pretty fast", are because they are either standart or someone before the judge has evaluated it in a very good way.I asure you the judges(me personally) are taking their time and closely evaluating the hand, actions, stacksizes and stats if they exist.They are also taking into consideration any specific questions by the OP or in the replies.
Self evaluating and arguing with the judges opinion is indeed the right path to take.The more people do it, the more effective the whole evaluation system would be.

Some advices from me:

Include specific questions when you post the hand. Ask what part of the hand you would like to have a more detailed help with.You can have a specific question in a what looks like a very standart hand,and the judge attention needs to be brought to the detail thats missing for you.

When you dont agree to the judges decision, just replying after him isnt enough,many times newer hands bump down the discussed one, and it stays in the pack of evaluated hands with your questions unanswered.
You have to alert us ,so please click the button "advise the judge to take another look" every time you want the hands to be reevaluated or your new questions answered. That removes the "evaluated by XXXX" label from the hand and we know it needs another look.

Best regards,
darkonebg


Talic Topic starter
Talic
Joined: 04.01.2008
PokerStrategist

Originally posted by darkonebg

Originally posted by Balanarm
Start analyzing your hands yourself, use active learning instead of passive ;) I didn't notice any problems with hand judges btw, seems like they are judging pretty fast and I'd say too fast ;D Need argumented judgements! :)

The reason most of the hands look like judged "pretty fast", are because they are either standart or someone before the judge has evaluated it in a very good way.I asure you the judges(me personally) are taking their time and closely evaluating the hand, actions, stacksizes and stats if they exist.They are also taking into consideration any specific questions by the OP or in the replies.
Self evaluating and arguing with the judges opinion is indeed the right path to take.The more people do it, the more effective the whole evaluation system would be.

Some advices from me:

Include specific questions when you post the hand. Ask what part of the hand you would like to have a more detailed help with.You can have a specific question in a what looks like a very standart hand,and the judge attention needs to be brought to the detail thats missing for you.

When you dont agree to the judges decision, just replying after him isnt enough,many times newer hands bump down the discussed one, and it stays in the pack of evaluated hands with your questions unanswered.
You have to alert us ,so please click the button "advise the judge to take another look" every time you want the hands to be reevaluated or your new questions answered. That removes the "evaluated by XXXX" label from the hand and we know it needs another look.

Best regards,
darkonebg

I have few things to add: if you post a hand post stats, post stats, post stats :)


Jumbles
Joined: 06.10.2007
Oldschool Grinder

Maybe it would be worth having a guide to converting hands in elephant, as you can export stats with the hand.

p.s.

Originally posted by Talic
I play much&bad

Congrats on becoming a judge:tongue:


Xantos
Joined: 07.09.2005
Legacy Member

Maybe darkonebg will be wandering off to the future Bulgarian community? ;)


darkonebg
Joined: 17.01.2008
Oldschool Grinder

Originally posted by Xantos
Maybe darkonebg will be wandering off to the future Bulgarian community? ;)

You bet I will!
I expect our community to expand really fast, due to the lack of concurrence. There will be a lot to be done, and Im up for it.


Gerv
Joined: 07.05.2008
Elite Grinder

Any critiques on my SSS verdicts?? Because I always want to know what to improve in my judging :)

Thanks in advance


NiekamNeidomu
Joined: 29.05.2007
Elite Grinder

im just wondering.. does an1 here ever heard of Hem.. PT or Elephant? no? i Think PS should hire some maids to to wash my dishes.. since im to borred to do so i can spend some more time and complain on forum..
if you have time to complain go trough your database and search for leaks occasionaly for your self ;)


Share: