I'm copying a post from my blog, because I'd like some decent feedback on the performance of big hands from other players.
By big hands I mean QQ+, AQ+ - ignore the fact JJ > AQ.. I couldn't be bothered picking them all out and PT3 conveniently lists the Ax hands together.
Since 1 July (approx 12.5k hands) my WTS/W$SD is 38.4/55.35 and I've run at -2.61BB/100. The WTS is a little high so possibly I'm not folding beaten hands often enough in these big pots so I figured I check how much value I'm getting from this premium range.
Hand, Times dealt, Win %age, WTS, W$SD, BB/hand
AA: 68, 72%, 75%, 59%, 1.66BB
AKs: 37, 70%, 29%, 50%, 0.48BB
AKo: 102, 50%, 52%, 46%, -0.16BB
AQs: 42, 48%, 56%, 52%, 0.49BB
AQo: 130, 47%, 54%, 52%, 0.16BB
KK: 48, 63%, 72%, 55% 1.11BB
QQ: 63, 70%, 68%, 55%, 1.15BB
I'm not 100% sure, but I'm guessing this is pretty sick. Especially when AA which is, at worst, 80% to win pre flop. And QQ winning more than KK and only slightly lower than AA. AKo is clearly being very badly played. ![]()
And I guess sample size is small, but I'm trying to determine the extent to which my losses might be attributable to variance and how much to bad play. I'm assuming for the sake of argument that I'm not overplaying these hands, or folding them incorrectly as there can't be too many situations where this might happen over this sample size.
Yes, I know this assumption could be a little too much because I'm a muppet, but I prefer to think I'm more Scooter than Gonzo. ![]()
Sooo.. how do these win rates compare to you other folks out there in PS.com FL land? Anything stick out or suggest itself from a look at these stats?

