[Closed] Good sites for 6 tabling NL10 + 25 FR.

General Poker Discussion

Last Post by PocketAcesJohn 16 years ago

5 Posts

4 Users

0 Reactions

734 Views

RSS

PocketAcesJohn

Joined: 19.06.2008

Posts: 1,129

26.11.2010, 21:15 0

Are there actually any other than Full-Tilt that meet the criteria of having enough traffic to contintely have 6 tables open?

Pokerstars i find games tighen up quite drastically within a few orbits of the table so i find my self contantley changing tables. This is resulting in a lower amount of hand per hour (250hands/hour aprox)

Full-Tilt is fine, 350hands/hour no probs, you dont have to change tables offten which is good although on occasion you do.

Anyone know of any othersites? Proferabley with a decent VIP system or rakeback. PartyPoker doesnt count because from my experience thats kind of as bad as pokerstars.

Cheers.

4 replies

peche025

Joined: 14.12.2008

Posts: 1,387

26.11.2010, 23:44 0

At the beginning of this year I was playing NL25 + 50 FR at Ladbrokes, it might be something to check out although the software sucks a bit which means less hands/hour. IMO Full Tilt is better, you could also check out ipoker.

adamjjj

Joined: 20.10.2009

Posts: 51

26.11.2010, 23:58 0

quite easy most of the time on on-game the only difference is it the micros go NL10 - NL20 - NL30

_Anonymous_

26.11.2010, 23:58 0

Originally posted by peche025
IMO Full Tilt is better, you could also check out ipoker.

unless you need the traffic (6 tabling nl10/25 doesn't seem like much, theres no reason to play on the tough sites filled with grinders. Just go for the smaller sites like everest, cake ongame etc.

PocketAcesJohn Topic starter

Joined: 19.06.2008

Posts: 1,129

27.11.2010, 00:49 0

Thanks for feedback

What kind of average VP% could iexpect on Ongame and Landbrokes?