Originally posted by Kodark
Originally posted by Hahaownedlolz
Originally posted by Kodark
Originally posted by Hahaownedlolz
Originally posted by Kodark
Its simple. If he has been getting lucky he will lose it all. If he is an amazing poker player he will keep winning until he is playing NL200+
Not sure what game your playing. This is true in chess. But there's this thing called variance in poker. And 15-20bi brm at plo does not seem even close to safe brm to me personally.
Not sure what post you're reading, i never said he practised safe BRM....
You imply he has the potential to keep winning if he's an amazing poker player
Thus by implying that you are either saying one of the following:
1 His brm is fine if he's an amazing player.
2 You do not need decent brm in poker to be succesful if your good enough.
I find both of them to be false. Ofcourse there is a point where your winrate is so big is so big that you can play with such agressive brm. I however do not believe such a winrate is realistically possible at the state poker is currently in. 10 years ago.. maybe.. right now... unlikely.
Wrong again. He said himself he is now practising safe BRM. He was only not doing so as he earned the original money. Thus he has the ability to keep on winning if he is good enough as I stated, but without a greater sample size noone can be sure. As i stated previously...
Your response makes no sense. Your basicaly saying 1 that his brm is fine. i do not believe he ever moved down limits after saying he was practicing brm. Technically i believe he was following some sort of brm almost from the start. Just not good/safe brm. 2 BI brm is still brm.
I do not believe he ever said he practiced safe or decent brm. And i can't be bothered looking over all his posts to see what he exactly said.