Originally posted by arjun2001
But is that like mathematically an alright thing? I mean what are the odds of you coming back to the original amount after 20k hands in your case.
I fail to see what could be mathematically wrong here. If you are break even player then you will still have same amount of money after 1k, 5k, 20k, 100k hands. Of course there will be minor differences because of variance.
And one more thing. Dont be unhappy that you break even, because in my opinion breaking even in poker can be counted as winning. There are couple reasons why i think this way - you pay rake so without rake you are actually winning something, perhaps you can look into site that gives rakeback to get profit. Then you also get frequent player points on most if not all sites and you can later spend those points to buy into tournaments, buy electronics or other stuff. And last but not the least - when you play poker you can learn to become better player. And if you can learn how to play without losing money and get previously said benefits, i think its a great thing.
