Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] mylove190207 - hand evaluations QQ

7 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
707 Views
mylove190207
Joined: 10.04.2011
PokerStrategist

Can I call that? If he have JJ, TT, 44, 33, AT, A2, 65s, then I have 62,73% equity. I am only beat with 2 pairs, witch I doubt he have, and set. With AA or KK he will go all in before flop. Even AK I doubt he have.

Known players:
[tg]Position_Stack:hands/vp$ip/RaisePreflop/AF/WTS/ORL/BBvsSteal/W$SD;UTG1$6,25:178/11/11/4.7/38/31/100/40;MP1$4:46/35/22/2.8/23/17/100/33;MP2$4,89:184/13/10/1.6/15/33/100/50;Hero$4:///////;[/tg]
0,02/0,04 No-Limit Hold'em (9 handed)
Hand recorder used for this poker hand: PokerStrategy.com Elephant 0.102 by www.pokerstrategy.com.

Preflop: Hero is MP3 with Q♦, Q♣
UTG1 raises to $0,16, UTG2 folds, MP1 calls $0,16, MP2 calls $0,16, Hero calls $0,16, 4 folds.

Flop: ($0,70) T♦, 4♥, 3♣ (4 players)
UTG1 bets $0,67, MP1 raises to $3,84 (All-In), 3 folds.

Final Pot: $5,21


6 replies

Why not 3bet pre-flop? You've given yourself a real difficult situation here as its so hard to put either of them on a hand. It could be 33, 44, TT, but then it could be JJ - some players at 4NL would play AT this way too.

In future I'd say just 3bet with your premium hands and avoid this sort of problem.


mylove190207 Topic starter
mylove190207
Joined: 10.04.2011
PokerStrategist

Why not 3bet pre-flop?

Because UTG1 is nity player, so in his raise range are TT+ or AK and there is also one nity player in MP2. So I decide just to set mine.


veriz
Joined: 20.07.2008
BlackMember

Hello mylove190207,

Preflop: Well, obviously Calling is totally fine here. I mean if you are against a nit then his 4bet/Broke range is going to be something like KK+/AK and do we really want to go broke against him? For that reason obviously playing it this way should be totally fine.

As played
Postflop: Not much you can do, I wouldn't continue either here while I played it passively preflop. Good fold!

Best Regards.


In that case if you just flat-call pre are you just set-mining? Seems a bit of a waste with QQ?


id rather squeez fold vs the nit and squeez for value vs the other players, otherwise, seems really quite a waste with QQ.


veriz
Joined: 20.07.2008
BlackMember

Originally posted by Scooney
In that case if you just flat-call pre are you just set-mining? Seems a bit of a waste with QQ?

Why should be just set-mining? We also can play for overpair and then reevaluate it postflop. If we are squeezing then most likely against a nit we have to consider of Squeeze/Folding. Since their 4bet range is going to be KK+ and maybe some AK type of hands at the best for us which is a flip.


Share: