Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

NL2- TT against preflop push

4 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
279 Views

Hello,

what should be our calling range in this spot against his stack?

Thanks!

Known players:
[tg]Position_Stack:hands/vp$ip/RaisePreflop/AF/WTS/ORL/BBvsSteal/W$SD;SB$0,87:18/28/6/1.0/25/0/-/0;UTG$2,15:20/60/10/1.5/25/33/-/67;UTG1$1,95:33/64/24/2.7/29/33/-/0;Hero$2:///////;[/tg]
0,01/0,02 No-Limit Hold'em (10 handed)
Hand recorder used for this poker hand: PokerStrategy.com Elephant 0.105 by www.pokerstrategy.com.

Preflop: Hero is MP3 with T♥, T♦
UTG calls $0,02, UTG1 raises to $0,04, 3 folds, Hero raises to $0,16, 2 folds, SB raises to $0,87 (All-In), 4 folds.

Final Pot: $1,11


Reply
Quote
3 replies
veriz
Joined: 20.07.2008

Hello Dback357,

Against his stack you can easily even Call with TT as well. :) Shouldn't be a huge problem while there is already some dead money in pot. Before asking me what should be the range be, try to guess always yourself and then I will say either it's to loose or tight. But right now it seems to be too tight.

Best Regards.


Reply
Quote
_Anonymous_ Topic starter
_Anonymous_

Originally posted by veriz
Before asking me what should be the range be, try to guess always yourself....

Good advice, thanks! :) I´ll try to do that. I downloaded your equity calculator, and according to that, we need roughly 40% equity (rake already included). According to Equilab, I have 40.28 against this range: JJ+,TsTc,AQs+,AQo+. The situation is nearly the same, if I substitute AQo and AQs with 99. So TT should be a call if he is capable of pushing AQ or 99.

He basically 4bet pushed, and he is an unknown, so I would put him reather on a strong range.

99+, AQ+ ?

Against this range, our calling range should be TT+, AK.

What do you think? :)


Reply
Quote
veriz
Joined: 20.07.2008

Such a guy can easily even push wider range, maybe include even worse PPs and worse Ax hands as AJ/AT even. Depends a lot on the opponent.

So something similar as you pointed out can be the calling range of ours but ain't a must, passive approach is always good and avoids the variance.


Reply
Quote
Share: