Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

NL2 Zoom 6 max TT bet on riveR?

9 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
975 Views
maythany
Joined: 18.10.2011
PokerStrategist

Poker Stars, $0.01/$0.02 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 6 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

SB: $2.50 (125 bb)
BB: $5.47 (273.5 bb)
UTG: $2.46 (123 bb)
Hero (MP): $2.14 (107 bb)
CO: $2 (100 bb)
BTN: $5.31 (265.5 bb)

Preflop: Hero is MP with T T
UTG folds, Hero raises to $0.06, CO folds, BTN calls $0.06, 2 folds

Flop: ($0.15) 6 Q 7 (2 players)
Hero bets $0.08, BTN calls $0.08

Turn: ($0.31) 2 (2 players)
Hero checks, BTN checks

River: ($0.31) 8 (2 players)
Hero bets $0.16, BTN calls $0.16

Results:

Spoiler

$0.63 pot ($0.02 rake)
Final Board: 6 Q 7 2 8
Hero showed T T and lost (-$0.30 net)
BTN showed Q J and won $0.61 ($0.31 net)

What do you guys think about betting on the river?

I bet beacuse I believe weaker will call like PPs

Also I only have 2 hands on opponent so no reliable reads.

Thanks!


Reply
Quote
8 replies
metza
Joined: 28.01.2012
PokerStrategist

The only weaker pp he can really have here is 99 though. 55-33 fold flop, and if they don't fold, they will fold river.

I prefer to just x/c the river, but I probably would have bet turn also for value vs draws and then check/fold river w TT (and check calling with some weaker Qx)


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010
PokerStrategist

Do you think villain will bet the river with worse if we check?


Reply
Quote
metza
Joined: 28.01.2012
PokerStrategist

Originally posted by nitrol
Do you think villain will bet the river with worse if we check?

Yeah, if he has a busted draw and we check twice imo he's bluffing it.


Reply
Quote
YohanN7
Joined: 15.06.2009
PokerStrategist

Bet-folding in a spot like this becomes interesting versus a fairly balanced opponent and you decide to not check-fold because your hand is far up in the bluff-catching range. Then you need to compare bet-fold and check-call. Since the opponent is balanced, the check-call should have about zero EV. But there may be hands that are worse than yours that will call a bet but not bet for value (and also not bet for bluff because they are too good). If this part of his range is substantial, then a bet-fold may be better than the check-call. If, in addition, you think the opponent will bet for value if you check if and only if he has you beat, then bet-fold is definitely better.

In this case, the "target part" of his range (looks like 99, maybe A♣:8♣: or so) is too small to attempt a bet-fold IMO, because you also expose yourself to getting bluff-raised out by a (small) amount of hands. If the board was 2♣:2♦:2♠:Q♠:3♥:, things would be different.


Reply
Quote
VaskataBuci
Joined: 08.08.2011
Oldschool Grinder

I would bet bigger otf to get more value from FD and SD. Why not betting the turn? The 8 on the river hits better his range, now he could have 2 pairs, strait. I'm more inclined to x/c the river or even x/f (depends of course of the size if he bets).


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010
PokerStrategist

If we bet flop, bet turn, are we x/f the river?


Reply
Quote
VaskataBuci
Joined: 08.08.2011
Oldschool Grinder

Depends on the bet size, I think. Probably x/c is better.


Reply
Quote
CPallo
Joined: 12.04.2012
PokerStrategist

I think you played this hand quite well after all. It's NL2, so there could be still some worse one-pair hands that he is going to call you with. And as this is NL2, he won't bluff the river at all in general, so I think betting is actually fine.


Reply
Quote
Share: